Mohd.Sharifuddin v. The Genrl.Manager, And ANR

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 23835 OF 2002 Between:

Mohd. Sharifuddin, S/o Mohd.Jameen Ali, aged 45 years, Occ : Ex-Secretary, PACS Regulagadda, Nidamanur (M) Nalgonda District. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The General Manager, Nalgonda District, Co-op., Central Bank Ltd , Nalgonda.

2. Deputy Registrar, Co-op Societies, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. ,..RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the orders passed by the respondent no.1 in Rc. No.Adm/A6i E 169i94-95, dt.12-5-01 confirming the terminatron of the petitioner pending disposal of appeal before Co-op Tribunal, Hyd in CTA no.24lO1, filed challenging the order passed by the respondent no.2 in Rc.No.14B3/95-E, d1.17-7-02 as illegal, null and void and contrary to the principles of natural justice and equity and set-aside the same. |.A.NO:1 OF 2002(WPMP. NO:29918 OF 2002) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To suspend the operation of order in Rc. No.Ad m/A6/F169/94-95 , d1.12-5-2001 issued by the 1st respondent.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.MOHD MOINUDOIN ( NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents : SRI.V.BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY The Court made the following ORDER

/ THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.2383s OF 2o02 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the respondents is present. However, there is no representation from the petitioner. The Writ Petition pertains to the year 2OO2. Tlne matter is listed today under the caption for 'final hearing'. In spite of repeated calls, none appears for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case.

2.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed SD/.B.SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY'

GD SECTION OFFICER To \

1. One CC to SRI.MOHD MOINUDDIN, Advocate [OPUC] Z. One CC to SRI.V.BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies

4. One spare coPY S.A GJP

a HIGH COURT DATED:0810G12022 k ;iE S IA /iJ 0 z AUr 2$2

ORDER

)'

i:

WP.No.23835 of 2002 t;- -'

-:,/ DISMISSING THE W.P FOR NON - PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

r/ ))-'-