Peddamoni Ramesh v. State Of Telangana
[ 3219 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 15627 OF 2018 Between:
Peddamoni Ramesh, S/o-Papaiah, Aged about 39 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o Chitlankunta Village, Padara Mandal, Nagarkurnool. - ...PETITIONER AND State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayatraj, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.
The District Panchayatraj Officer, At Nagarkurnool, Nagarkurnool District. The Panchayat Secretary, Chitlankunta Gram Panchayat, Padara [Vlandal, Nagarkurnool.
The Tahsitdar, Padara [Vlandal, Nagarkurnool. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate, order or direction more particularly, in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the act of the Res No.3 in not granting the permission for construction of the house on the house site of PIot No.44, admeasuring 121 square yards of Chitlankunta Village, Padara Mandal (Erstwhile Amrabad Mandal), [Vlahaboobnagar District on the Patta Certificate issued by the Res No.4 vide proceeding No. B/1346/2009 dated 26-03-2009, issuing the notice by Res Nb.3 vide proceeding No.A1l01/20'1 7 dated 29-12-2017 without considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 27-12-2017 as illegal arbitrary and against principles of natural justice, consequently to direct the Res No.4, not to allot the said PIot to any third party.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Res No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner Dt:27-12-2017 lo issue permission for construction of house on Plot No_.44 admeasuring 121 square yards of Chitlankunta Village, Padara tVandal (Erstwhile Amrabad IVandal), Mahaboobnagar District, on the Patta Certificate issued by the Res No.4 vide proceeding No. B/1346/2009 dated 26-03-2009.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI K. PRADEEP REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE IION'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.l5627 0F 2018
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.3 in not granting the permission lor construction of the house on the house site of plot No.44 admeasuring l2l sq.yards. of Chilankunta Village, Padara Mandal (Erstwhile Amrabad Mandal), Mahaboobnagar District, as illegal and I( arbitrary 2.
Leamed Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing lor respondent No.3, has produced a copy of the proceedings No.9lBPl2024, dated 14.02.2024, whereunder it is noticed that the petitioner has made a fresh application for house construction permission for the very same property on 08.02.2024 and the permission has been granted 3.
In view of the above submissions, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous.
TMD,I wp 15627 2018 4.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- K. AMMAJI $,f"t REG-1'111IAqSI //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri lV. Vijaya Kumar Goud, Advocate UC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CC to The GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUT]
4. One CC to Sri K. Pradeep Reddy, SC for Gram Panchayat[OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies TJ GJP YA-
I HIGH COURT DATED:2 510212025 - ,.u Slr.i4 (( J o 2 B il''A\ 2025 a tt t .,\(.s
ORDER
-.i.-i,-- WP.No.15627 ot 2018 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS qc"d4 Xd"