D.Kushal Prasad, v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

[ 3{66 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR i l WRIT PETITION NO: 15017 OF 20't5 Between:

i

1. D.Kushal Prasad, S/o. D.Chandrasekhar, Student, Minor, Rep.by his father and .natural gug1dia1, D.Chandraseskhar, S/o.D.Ramamohdn Rao, aged about 41 years, Rl/o- Secunderabad.

2. K.Sandeep, S/o. K.Sampath, Student, Minor, Rep.by his father and natural guardian, K.Sampath, S/o.K.Komaraiah, aged about 38 years, rio.New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad.

3. A.Reena Susan Mary, D/o. Anthony Rayon, Student, Minor, Rep.by her father and natural guardian, Anthony Rayon, S/o.Philip David, aged about 49 years, Rl/o.Bansilalpet, Secunderabad.

4. Ch.Priyanka, D/o.Ch.Srinivas, Student, Minor, Rep.by her father and natural quardian, Ch.Srinivas, S/o.Beerappa, aged about 42 years, r/o.Bansilalpet, Secunderabad.

l :;

i .....PETITIONERS AND 1 . The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Director of Govemment Examinations, Telangana State, Chappel Road, Hyderabad.

3. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Hyderabad.

4. The District Educational Officer, Hyderabad.

5. The Foundation Talent High School (Recognized by the, Government of AP), Rep.by its Correspondent, New Bhoiguda, Secunderabad .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in lhe nature of

-i!r.a:-, rd --+ i wRlT oF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in keeping the results of the students who had taken sSC Examinations in March, 2015 through Sth respondent school withheld as arbitrary, illegal and u ncon stitutional and further denying the opportunity of the failed students to take the supplementary examinations for which the last date of payment of fees is 30th May, 2015 as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to release the results of the students of the 5th respondent school.

|.A.NO:1 OF 2015 (WPMP.NOil94E 20F 20151 Petition Under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitirin, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the results of the students by acting on the representation of the 5th respondent school submitting the school recognition orders forthwith and receive the fee of the failed students for the supplementary examinations pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K.ANANTHA RAO (Nrf PRESENI) counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FoR ScHooL EDUCATI0N The Court made the following ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.15017 of2015 ORDER:

None appears for the petitioners.

2. This Writ Petition 1S filed to declare the action of l, 2nd respondent in keeping the results of the petitioners, who had taken SSC examination held in March, 2015 through respondent No.5 School under the heading 'Withheld' as being arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and furlher depriving/denying the opportunity of the failed students to take the supplementary ii examination by accepting the fees

3. This Court, by order dated 04-06-2015 passed ln 'li W.P.M.P.No.19482 of 2015 in W.P.No.150t7 of 2015, had granted interim direction to the respondents to release the results of the It t students i.e. by acting on the representation of the 5th respondent School and to receive the fees of the failed students for the supplementary examination.

4. On account ofthe aforesaid interim order passed by this Courl directing the respondent authorities to release the results of the

students incJuding the petitioners by considering the representation submitted by respondent No.5 and also to receive the f-ecs of the failed students for the supplementary examination, and having regard to the 1-act that nearly a decade had passed by since then, this Court is of the view that the relief sought for by the petitioners has been worked by itself on account of interim orders, and no further orders are necessary in the present Writ Petition.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.

SD/.A.SRINIVAS REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ r'f S TION OFFICER /TTRUE COPY// To .rl.TwoCCstoGPFoRSCHooLEDUcATloN,HighCourtfortheStateof - Telrnqana at HYderabad. [OUTI

2. oi; ic to sRtk.nrunru*tn RAo, Advocate [oPUc]

3. Two CD CoPies SA BSK *+

HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212024

ORDER

WP.No.15017 of 2015 .:,L4 x4:

t 9.

04 fi:i 20t5 >l Oi 1..

n * D2:S.r,AT lHeo CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

o p lr( lr t