N. Ramachandraiah v. The Director General Of Police

[ 3301 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOUR,ABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 3359 OF 2017 Between:

N.Ramachandraiah, S/o. Hanuma, aged About 40 years, Constable No. 1272, D.M.D.E. (Defense Machinery Designing Establishment), Tadban, Secunderabad, (Wrongly mentioned The present Unit as Axis Bank, Begumpet, Hyderabad) No. 1-10-125164, Street No.1, Allam Thota Bavi, Mayuri Marg, Begumpet, Hyderabad-'16.

...'ET.T,ONER AND

1. The Director General of Police, Telangana Special Protection Force, Secunderabad.

2. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary to Govt., Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The Commandant, Special Protection Force, Secunderrb"L.*TTTONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue to call for the records relating to and in connection with the impugned Memorandum Rc.No. A1/TSPF10512015, dated 16-2-2015 issued by the Director General, TSPF, Secunderabad and set-aside the same in so far as the applicant is concerned by declaring it as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution and consequently, direct the respondents to retain and continue the applicant in the present place of working i.e. D.M.D.E. (Defense Machinery Designing Establishment), Tadban, Secunderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ANWAR SIODIQUI FOR SRI POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondents: Government Pleader for Services (Home) The Court made the following: ORDER

I THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE PIJLLA KARTIIIK WRIT PETffiON {TRl No.3359 OF nl7

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Anlvai Siddiqui, learned counsel representing Sri P.Amarender, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the present Writ Petition (TR) does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous.

2.

Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

.OSMAN ALI BAIG TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER I s To OPUC] High Court for the One CC to SRI POODATTU AMARENDER, Ad iwo CCs to Govemment Pleader for Services ( State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies PSK.

HIGH COURT PK,J DATED:2510912025

ORDER

i HE SIA '(> r..

13 zBJAtt2o26 WP(TR).No.3359 ot 2017 I t (:h.

-? ^ DrsMrssrNG THE WRIT PETTT|ON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS t, x,