Dheeravath Devid v. The State Of Telangana Rep.By Its Principal Secretary To

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.6476 OF 2015 BETWEEN Dheeravath David ... PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Department of Home), A.P. Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and others.

...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Heard.

2. Petitioner, on whose complaint F.I.R.No.18 of 2015 was lodged by respondent No.5 on 23.01.2015, complains of no progress in the investigation and no steps are being taken by the investigating officer to apprehend the accused in the FIR.

3. Instructions of the learned Government Pleader, however, show that petitioner's complaint is under investigation and the complainant as well as his father and mother have already given the statements, which are recorded apart from the statement of eye witnesses to the incident, who have supported the complainant. It is stated that on 25.01.2015 petitioner was served with a notice to produce the supporting documents relating to the subject land and a letter was also addressed to the Tahsildar, Garidepally requesting him to furnish the particulars of pathway of the disputed land. It is further stated that the Tahsildar was requested for initiation of proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. in view of possibility of breach of peace.

Based on the said report, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalaguda Division, has served with notice to both parties on 29.01.2015 to show cause as to why proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C should not be promulgated. While so, respondent No.5 received two complaints from the petitioner's group as well as other group, which are registered as crime Nos.23 and 24 of 2015 and it is stated that crime No.189 of 2015 is inter linked and all the three crimes are under investigation. To the extent of crime Nos.23 and 24 of 2015, it is stated that the Sub Divisional Police Officer is nominated as the investigating officer and appropriate steps are being taken to complete the investigation in all crimes as early as possible and thereafter take appropriate steps as per section 173 Cr.P.C.

4. In view of the aforesaid, it is evident that all three crimes are under investigation and that an appropriate report will soon be filed after completing the investigation. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of directing the investigating officer to complete the investigation expeditiously and take appropriate steps. As a sequel, the

miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J March 27, 2015 Lmv