Pechetti Veera Venkata Satayanarayana Kumar v. Pechetti Sumati,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ***** Between:

Pechetti Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Kumar ... Petitioner And Pechetti Sumati and another

...Respondent

DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 14-08-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

Yes/No Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reports/Journals Yes/No Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

Yes/No THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO

ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the scheduled property in both the suits is not one and the same and the reliefs claimed are also different and therefore, the learned District Judge erred in allowing the petition under Section 24 of C.P.C. The learned District Judge has recorded a specific finding that the dispute involved and the evidence to be adduced in both the suits is one and the same and therefore, it is just and reasonable that both the matters are heard and tried by one and the same Court to avoid multiplicity of the litigation and conflicting decisions. I do not find any error committed by the learned District Judge. 3.

The civil revision petition is, therefore dismissed at the stage of admission. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed in this revision shall stand closed. _________________ R.KANTHA RAO, J Date:14.08.2015 Ccm THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO

Date:14-08-2015 ccm