← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/4722/2009dismissed as infructuous

S.Jagannatham v. K.Sai Kumar And 2 Others

2021-12-31P.Sree Sudha3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL EVISI NPE TION i47 oF 20 I PetitionunderSection22ofA.P.Building(lease,RentandEviction)ControlAct' lg60,aggrievedbytheorderdatedlo/o8i2ooginRANo.84/2008onthefileofthe Court of the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad by confirming the orders datedOTlO3l2008preferredagainsttheorderdatedoT/03/2ooSpassedinRC No.22t2007 on the file of the Principle Rent Controller' Secunderabad' Between:

S.Jagannatham, S/o. Late S Chandraiah ...PETITIONERYAPPELLANT/PETITIONER AND

1. K.Sai Kumar, S/0. Late K.Ramachandra Rao z. k Laoadish, S/o. Late K.Ramachandra Rao 3 P Shzntilal Jai' s/o t'"''?].*?SroNDENTs/REsPoNDENT./RESPoNDENTS CRPMP. NO: 6484 OF 20og Petitionundersectionl5lofCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin theaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtoissueaninterim injunction restralning 3d respondent from making any construction on the schedule property mentioned in RC pending disposal of the CRP For the Petitioner : SRI B.V.SUBBAIAH, Advocate FortheRespondents:SRlS.GANESHRAo,Advocate(notpresent) The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA CryIL REVISION ON NO.4722 0F o ORD Petitioner counsel present. Respondent counsel absent. On 17-L2-2O2I, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the building is ready for starting jeweilary business and the land lord also sold away the same and thus the cause of action does not survive for adjudication. Posted today for verification of the respondents counsel. But, he is not turned up. As it has already represented by petitioner counsel that there is no cause of action to survive, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPYII ^.'e,SiiN+mbi'5.'#^H (1t, To SECTION OFFICER 6, ffi gg giffi Lt$eil* &l'l'$:lila;

,''.

Kj \.;-

HIGH COURT DATED:3111212021

ORDER

CRP.No.4722 of 2009 .s J OISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS.

@