M.A. Mazeed, v. The State Of Telangana,
I [ 3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO:5299 OF 2017 Between:
1. M.A. Mazeed, S/o. Mohd. AMul Wali, Aged about 56 years, Divisional Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy East Division, Ranga Reddy District,
2. K. Srinivasa Reddy, Sio. K. Venkat Reddy, Aged about 48 years, Divisional Panchayat Officer, Peddapally, Karimnagar District.
3. B. Rani Bai, D/o. Bhansilal, Aged about 57 years, Divisional Panchayat Officer, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad - 500022.
2. Telangana State Public Service Commission, Nampally, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Secretary.
3. The Commissioner for Panchayat Raj &, Rural Employment, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of tle Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Orders, Direction or Directions to direct the respondents not to proceed in any manner to fill-up the post of District Panchayat Officer by way of direct recruitment in pursuance to a Notification No.18/2011, dated 28.11.2011 as the same is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 16 of the Constitution of lndia aM for a consequential direction to direct the respondents to fill-up the said posts by way of promotion from the eligible Divisional Panchayat Officers.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 6444OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to i direct the respondents not to proceed with direct recruitment to the post of Oistrict Panchayat Officer pursuant to Notification No.18/2011, dated 28.11.2011, e pending disposal of the writ petition.
, Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS :
Counsel for Respondents No.1&3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRt M.V. RAMA RAO (SPL. GOVT.PLEADER) The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO Writ Petition No.5299 of 2Ol7 ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri Rishik Reddy, learned counsel representing Smt Vedula Chitralekha, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
2.
Recording the above submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
\ SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANTTREGISTRAR //rRUE coPY// ,=Jffi,..=*r,"=* To, '1. One CC to SRI VEDULA SRINIVAS, Advocate. [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI M.V.RAMA RAO (SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER). [OPUC]
4. Turo CD CopiesBSK GJP q-
HIGH COURT i i DATED:04/Ogl2O23 LA e ,v g'
l.- iss 'o\ s t) tt o /5 u.:
ORDER
i)A oI t\ WP.No.5299 of 2017 \\l t c a DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS o\ 1)