B.Rajasekhar v. The State Of A.P. And Another
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD I\,lONDAY .THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 43 OF 2013 Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 and 401 of Cr'P'C against the orderdated 17.0g.2012 passed in M.C.No.137of 2010 onthefileof thecourtof the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, at L'B'Nagar ' Between:
B.Raiasekhar, S/o B.V. R. Murthy.aged 35 years, Occ: at present.Nil' R/o Flat "N6.562, ri.r.I".qi-1o'liza, veoiiheita Towers, Dwarakanagar' visakhapatnam' ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND
1. The State Of A.P., Represented by its Public Prosecutor' High Court of Andhra Pradesh, HYderabad
2. B.V.Padmavathi,, W/o B.Rajasekhar,aged 3-0 years' Occ: Ho^usewife'.R/o - Fidi N".s+a, dri 'nam vir,ji,'H.No.sz-2"516, Deience colony, Sainikpuri' Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS CRLRCMP . NO: 73 oF 2013 PetitionunderSection4B2Cr.PCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may- b^e^pl^eased to ,i"v -"rr further proceedi'ngs of the o_rder in lvl.c.No.137 of 2010, dated 17.0g.2012 on the file of ihe Judge, Family Court, R'R Dist ' at L'B'Nagar' pending disposal of the Crl.R.C.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl' S A V RATNAM Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI' A RAVI SHANKAR The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI Crl. R.C. No. 43 OF 2013 ORDER:
The learned counsel for the revision petitioners fairly submits that this matter became infructuous.
Recording the same, this revision petition is dismissed as " lnfructuous."
Sd/.A.V.S.S.C,S.SARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,a--.) SECT1ON OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY'
I
1. The Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar.
2. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. One CC to SRl. S A V RATNAM Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRl. A RAVI SHANKAR Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare Copy CDL
HIGH COURT DATED:2810312022 ffi
ORDER
CRLRC.No.43 of 2013 i .i zu JttL 2tr12 ,+ DISMISSING THE CRL,R.C AS INFRUCTUOUS 7,o