M/S Satya Bar And Restaurant, v. Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Rep. By Its
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI wRtT PET|T|ON NO.27156 0F 2012 Between:
M/s Satya Bar & Restaurant, Rep. by its Proprietor M. Shashikanth Reddy, Sy.No.176/2 & 3, Tadbund, Secunderabad.
...'ETIT,'NER AND1. Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Rep. by its, Chief Executive Officer, Secunderabad.
2. The Commissioner, Prohibition & Excise, Government of, A.P-, Hyderabad.
3. The Superintendent, Prohibition & Excise, Secunderabad. ..,RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction, preferably a Writ in the nature of IVlandamus declaring the impugned order of the 1st respondent dt.5'7-2012 in refusing renewal of trade license of the petitioner pursuant to the application dt 14-32012 and 3-7-2012 for running bar and restaurant at Sy.No.176/2 and 3, Tadbund, Secunderabad as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Sec.277 of Cantonment Act and consequently by setting aside the impugned order of the 1st respondent direct the 1st respondent to grant trade ltcense to the petitioner pursuant to the application dt.14-3-2012 and 3-7-2012 to enable the petitioner to continue its restaurant and bar business in the schedule premises under the Excise License for the year 2012-13 from 1-7-2012 to 30-6-2013.
WPMP. NO: 34587 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the application of the petitioner for renewal of excise license for the years 2012-13 without insisting trade license by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition. WPMP. NO:3 4s88 0F 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to grant trade license pursuant to the application of the petitioner d1.14.03.2012 and 3-7 -2012 for renewal of trade license, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. HARI PREETH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI K.R KOTESWERA RAO, Sr. S.C. FOR CANTONMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following: ORDER
/ HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.27156 OF 2012 OTIDER-:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not sun ive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/.K.SAILESHI ASISISTANT REGISTBAR I\-'- SECTION OFFICER To,1. One CC to Sri C. Hari Preeth, Advocate [OPUC]
2. On; CC to Sri K,R. Koteswera Rao, Sr. S.C. for Cantonment tqPUCl - - a. iil CCs toGp for prohibition and Excise, High Courl for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
4. Two CD Copies.
5. One Spare CoPY.
"d"
//TRUE COPY'
HIGH COURT DATED:31 10812021 STAieORDER q :)oo WP.No.27156 of 2012 20 sEP20?1 {, * ..1-!
./-C DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS ?
9\