Kethavath Sunitha v. State Of Telangana

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE JSREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 1198 OF 2017 Between:

Kethavath Sunitha, D/o Kethavath Parma Nails, aged 24 years, Rl/o Mudigonda Village, Jarpula Thanda Devarakonda Mandal, Nalgonda District. ...PETITIONER AND

1. State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, General Administration (Services-A) Department Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

2. Telangana State Public Service Commissionrep by The Secretary, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2nd Respondent in calling the Petitioner for verification of her certificates pursuant to her selection for the post of Agriculture Extension Officers Grade-ll in pursuance of Notification No. 1912015 dated 30.12.2015 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and issue consequential direction to the 2nd Respondent to verify the certificates of the Petitioner pursuant to her selection to the post of Agriculture Extension Officer Grade-ll.

l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 1333 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to verify the certificates of the Petitioner pursuant to her selection to the post of Agriculture Extension Officer Grade-ll. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.RAJKUMAR Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO Writ Petition No. 1198 of 2Ot7 ORDER:

When the matter was taken up for consideration on 23.09.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give one opportunity, the matter was posted to 26.09.2023 under the caption "For Dismissal,,. 2.

Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, inspite of 1isting under the caption ,,For Dismissal". It appears that the petitioner is not having any interest in prosecuting the matter.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/. K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTBAR p,.

SECTIOMOFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI P.RAJKUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-|, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies PSK.

GJP I //TRUE COPY//

HIGH COURT DATED:2610912023

ORDER

ii 1? 0[T 2m WP.No.1198 of 2017 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

/-, !3 Ir\A- ------r- l- - \ \ \\c\\ )' t