Ratnam Bharath Kumar, Adilabad v. Chairman, Srisaraswathi Grameena Bank, Adilabad And 2

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.13535 OF 2004

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation and hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI 11th December, 2018 rkk

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.6805 OF 2004

ORDER

On 28.11.2018, none appeared and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal". Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI 29th November, 2018 rkk