← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/6076/2020dismissed as infructuous

Nyaramparandhama v. The State Of Telangana

2024-10-04E.V. Venugopal3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6076 OF 2020 Between:

Nyaram Parandhama, S/o.Late Nyaram Chandramouli, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Govt. Teacher, R/o. Post Office Lingampally, Bachannapet Mandal,. Warangal District .....PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO 3 AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor. High Court for the State of Telangana At Hyderabad. ......RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

2. Nyaram Krishnaveni, Wo. Nyaram Eknath, D/o. Adicherla Komuraiah, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Tailoring, R/o. H.No.2-1-254, Rajupeta Village, lVlanug uru Mandal, Khammam District.

RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in CC No. 237 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate at Manuguru taken on file under Sections 498(,4), 506 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of D.P Act and quash the same against the Petitioner l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further Proceedings including appearance of the Petitioner in CC No.

237 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate at [t/lanuguru pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of SMT J. SUNITHA ,Advocate for the Petitioner (not being present) and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION N0.6076 0F 2o20 ORDE R:

I Today, when the matter has been taken up, Sri E.Ganesh, learned Assistant public prosecutor for respondent No. 1 - State wh,e furnishing a copy of online case status report, submitted that this matter has become infructuous and that the cause in this matter does not survive as the matter is settled before the Lok-Adalat and the trial Court has disposed of the case on O9.O9.2O23 and prayed to dismiss this Criminal Petition.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The copy of online case status report submitted by the learned Assistant Public prosecutor for respondent No. l_State is taken on record.

4.

Recording the above submission, this Criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/. A. SRINIVASA REODY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Manuguru Khammam District

2. The Station House Officer, Manuguru Police Station Manuguru Khammam District

3. One CC to SMT J. SUNITHA Advocate IOPUC]

4. TWO CCs to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of (r Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies ta

HIGH COURT DAf ED:04110t2024 T S c r6 ( J C)(.'

202[ '(I {'

11OEC

ORDER

CRLP.No.6076 ol 2020 t ocsPAlc DISSMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS Y 2e It