Pulimi Raghuram v. The Principal District Judge,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI WRIT PETITION No. 9935 of 2017 ORDER: (Per VRS,J) Aggrieved by his non-appointment to the post of Examiner, pursuant to a recruitment undertaken by the 1st respondent, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition. 2.

Heard Mr. K. R. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Bobba Vijayalakshmi, learned standing counsel for the High Court, takes notice for the respondents 1 and 2. 3.

The learned standing counsel passed on a notice, dated 18.03.2017, issued by the 1st respondent cancelling the entire process of selection, as per the High Court's letter, dated 14.03.2017. Since the entire process of selection has been cancelled, no individual relief can be granted to the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. __________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J ______________ J. UMA DEVI, J.

21st March, 2017 cbs

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 9935 of 2017 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN  AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI Writ Petition No. 9935 of 2017 (dismissed) 21st March, 2017 cbs