Pandaga Sugendhar Varaprasad, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
ÐÏࡱá>þÿ 79þÿÿÿ6ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ð¿‹bjbjqPqP ;"::W3ÿÿÿÿÿÿ¤ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÖz z z 82 Î Öî î . ÷ ÷ ÷ TM››››››$h„Æ¿Â÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ¿Â ÛÔ ÷ ô  TM ÷ TM  ⠀›‰a©Ðz ëp TMê0‐ J[úJ J ì÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ¿¿U X÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÷ ÖÖÖ¤z ÖÖÖz ÖÖÖÂÂÂÂÂÂÿÿÿÿ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 159 OF 2013 ORDER: None appears for the petitioners and there is no representation on their behalf. The petitioners are arrayed as A-1 to A-5 in C.C.No.308 of 2012, which they seek to be quashed in this petition. The second respondent is the wife of the first petitioner herein. She was the defacto complainant and her complaint was registered as F.I.R No.
19 of 2012 by Alair Police Station, Nalgonda District on 28.01.2012. After investigation, the police have filed charge-sheet for the offence under Section 498-A I.P.C and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act read with 34 I.P.C. There is no dispute that the second respondent-defacto complainant was the wife of the first petitioner herein and that their marriage took place on 06.02.2009. It is set out in the complaint that, at the time of marriage, a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- was paid as dowry to the first petitioner apart from 200 sq.yards of plot at Bibinagar, 10 tulas of gold and a Pulsar motorbike. The defacto complainant also appeared for the 2009 District Selections Committee (DSC) Selections and was selected as a teacher and she is presently working as a teacher at Rajapeta.
It is her further case that she gave birth to a male child on 01.01.2010. However, the petitioners herein started making illegal demands for securing additional dowry. It is also her case that the petitioners have moved away to Karimnagar. It was also her case that when she requested the first petitioner herein to join her company, her request was denied and she has also been ill-treated. It was her further case that a panchayat before the community elders was organized on 06.01.2011. Though, the first petitioner agreed for restoration of the conjugal rights before the elders, but however, he kept on insisting for meeting the unjust demand for additional dowry. The only reason why the petitioners seek quashing of the charge sheet is that, the first petitioner has approached the Family Court at Karimnagar and instituted O.P.No.
3 of 2012 seeking divorce from the defacto complainant herein. It is the further case of the petitioner that the notice in the said O.P.No.3 of 2012 was received by the second respondent on 25.01.2012 and hence, she filed a false complaint on 28.01.2012. Therefore, this chargesheet deserves to be set-aside. The fact that the first petitioner herein has filed an O.P. for dissolution of the marriage by granting a decree of divorce to him cannot be a ground for quashing a charge-sheet. The question which is liable to be examined in such circumstances was whether there was any material to lend support to the charge-sheet and if there is some material behind any such charge-sheet, it is not open to the Court to speculate as to whether the same will fetch a conviction to the accused or not.
In the given circumstances and facts, no case is made out for quashing the charge-sheet and hence, this criminal petition is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending shall also stand dismissed. _______________________________________ JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO 18.06.2015 sp PAGE PAGE 2 PAGE -./ADEHIKNOPQVWX ̈©èéh ôæÛÒÉ1⁄2±É ̈ŸŸqdYQIQAQh¦EâOJQJh__2OJQJhÍIOJQJhâ îh1⁄4?šOJQJhWPrh1⁄4?šCJOJQJhÑ©h1⁄4?š5>*OJQJh‡oh1⁄4?š5CJOJQJhð\k5OJQJhHv5OJQJhM[ê5OJQJhŸf5OJQJh‡oh1'Ë5OJQJh‡oh1⁄4?š5OJQJhÇa5OJQJh#zþ5OJQJh1⁄4?š5CJOJQJh7"eh1⁄4?š5CJOJQJh.ä5CJOJQJ./QX©fE ́+HSVWY÷ïäÜÍÍÍÍ3⁄4μ¬ ›››TMgd¡qf$„Ð`„Ða$gd¡qf„Ð`„Ðgd^ƒ„Ð`„Ðgd¦Eâ$„Ðdà`„Ða$gd9Ý$„Ðdà`„Ða$gdÍIdàgd1⁄4?š $dàa$gd1⁄4?
š$a$gdÑ©$a$gd#zþWŠýýh o ¥ ¦ 1 » ! H I J T Å Ì 5[\ef18"3 ́#*+GHIJMRóëãëãëãëãëãëóëÛãÛÏÛëÛÏÛÇÛ¿· ̄§Ÿ"ŠwmwchÔICJOJQJh'F,CJOJQJhŸYCJOJQJh¡qf5OJQJhÔI5OJQJh¡qfh¡qf5OJQJhÔIO ‚ƒ„†‡‰Š‹óæÜÏÇÃÇÃÇÃÇÃ1313 ̄131¤13 ̄1313 ̄3 ̄ÃÏh¶fä0JmHnHuh¶fä h¶fä0Jjh¶fä0JUh÷^-jh÷^-UhÉÈhr%CJOJQJhÉÈCJOJQJhWPrhÉÈCJOJQJhWPrh¡qfCJOJQJ!YZ\]_`bclmnyz{„... †‡ˆ‰Š‹ýýýýýýýñïýñïýãáýãáýýÜgd¡qf„üÿ„&`#$gdnR„üÿ„&`#$gd7"e9 0&P1h:p¦Eâ°Ð/ °ÀN!°p"°p#1$Ô %°°Ð°ÐІœ@@ñÿ@NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@òÿ¡DDefault Paragraph FontRióÿ3RTable Normalö4Ö l4Öaö(kôÿÁ(No List4 @ò4ÖqFooter ÆàÀ!.)@¢.ÖqPage Number4@4=%úHeader ÆàÀ!>">»@/ Footnote TextCJaJ@&¢1@»@/Footnote ReferenceH*‹"ÿÿÿÿ.
/QX©fE ́+HSVWYZ\]_`bclmnyz{„...†‡ˆ‰Œ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃0€€ ̃@0€€Iˆ0h ̃@0€€Iˆ0h ̃@0€€Iˆ0 €IÈ0 € ̃@0€€ ̃@0€€ ̃@0€€ ̃@0€€IÈ0IÈ0 ̃@0€€ ̃@0€€IÈ0 Iˆ0Lh $/2225h R‹Y‹Š $+5!•!ÿ•€!•ð8ð@ñÿÿÿ€€€÷ð'ðð0ð( ð ððB ðSð¿Ëÿ ?ðho·1⁄4ÍÕÅÌÆÎÚãèí»Ã«μnwí÷18WWYYZZ\]_`bc‰Œ/DSUWWYYZZ\]_`bc‰Œ33è饦1» !HIPT[\SW_3 ́ ́VWWYYZZ\]_`bcknx{ƒ††ŒWWYYZZ\]_`bc‰Œõåô†%3⁄4AÆoP',8ÕóIPçf)k ‹co F‹F Hv".Sù\ip28Ü5Öq¤VÁlðBÿ2D#6P$%-r%5&§)'F,g{, .a.»@/Ý0}0Ý(0%{01}1__2R\4>.5Y=6u7Õ,7† 9Ö)>6>Â6>*?
ÙA¶AX%C§PCŽPD±3HXHÔIÍI ̃BJ|JûZK¡cK ̈NLTMOLHN3QB QnRpRaT3fXŸY'^]^A$^=^ÇawEaÒMaë|a9bμEbUc|de7"eæJeGnf¡qfð\kNl;Om‡oÂp ́rWPr tciuAnumvìWv{cvn^xØRz‰U| †J}_}Op€^ƒó„6„L~†Q'‡*fˆÖ)‰·B‰,lŠ%ZŒ°ð ŽÌŽ1⁄4+Žöx;k""z•`•A-÷^-Ÿf-í?-¢wTM1⁄4?š|[šakšÇ/›÷Y›°œE08ŸnŸšwŸ" ¬^ Þ!¤,¥zF ̈Ñ©ôaÎ9¬ÓP¬ž4nÖ2šQ2μ3x ́μ^Oμ ̧C¶y ̧...A»_1⁄2TM%1⁄2Î;3⁄4Ï¿X¿ê+ÁGÂ1⁄2*ÃÙCÄ'?ÅŠYÅÕÈÉÈKFÈË1'ËNËèvËmTÌatÌñ,Ï8ÏôbÐÑÒÃqÒYÓjZÔØÚ>~ÚeuÛÜ#cÜ9ÝÆÞ}UÞuàæ á¦Eâ]ã.ä'9ä¶fäö}å \æ'~æB$çn9ç÷eèpèo"é|éM[êÄëâ îpï†ðdlñˆbóVKô¿ö=%ú5]ûrý#zþ×}þ|nÿÿ@€VV7 VV‹p@ÿÿUnknownÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿGÿ:àCxÀ ÿTimes New Roman5€Symbol3&ÿ:àCxÀ ÿArialK,‡ŸBookman Old Style"1ˆðÐh-kÉ"6‡È"6‡-§×€ ×€ ðp1 ́ ́4QQ2ƒðHX ðÿ?
äÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿöx2ÿÿ1⁄4This writ petition seeks a writ of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to constitute a special purpose vehicle with the petitioner for e-procurement basis and for declaring condition nosJudge Administratorþÿà...ŸòùOh«'+'3Ù0@ ̃ ht„œ¬ ÄÐ ðü (08äÀThis writ petition seeks a writ of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to constitute a special purpose vehicle with the petitioner for e-procurement basis and for declaring condition nosJudgeNormalAdministrator151Microsoft Office Word@aîÚ^@Œwa©Ð@3⁄4±ckñÍ@ÒÆša©Ð×€ þÿÕÍÕœ."-+,ù®0¤hp|„Œ"œ¤¬ ́ 1⁄4...
äQæ1⁄2This writ petition seeks a writ of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to constitute a special purpose vehicle with the petitioner for e-procurement basis and for declaring condition nosTitle þÿÿÿþÿÿÿ !"#$%þÿÿÿ'()*+,- þÿÿÿ/012345þÿÿÿýÿÿÿ8þÿÿÿþÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Entryÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÀF`‚•a©Ð:€Data ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ1TableÿÿÿÿJWordDocumentÿÿÿÿ;"SummaryInformation(ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ&DocumentSummaryInformation8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ.CompObjÿ ÿÿÿÿ ÀFMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.