Madakam Jogaiah, Khammam Dist And 3 Others v. Collector And Dist Magistrate, Khammam Dist And Another

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17000 OF 2014 Between:

1. Madakam Jogaiah S/o. Kannaiah, Hindu, R/o.Repaka Village Kunavaram Mandal, Khammam District.

2. Dharmula Ramaiah S/o.Kannaiah, Hindu, R/o.Repaka Village Kunavaram Mandal, Khammam District.

3. Smt.Podiyam Kannamma, Wo.Late Ramaiah, Hindu, R:/o.Repaka Village Kunavaram Mandal, Khammam District.

4. Smt.Dharmula Venkamma Wo.Veeraiah, Hindu, R/o.Repaka Village Kunavaram Mandal' Khammam District ...pETraoNERS AND

1. The Government of Telangana, Rep. by its Collector & District Magistrate Khammam, Khammam District.

2. The Divisional Forest Officer, Bhadrachalam (South) Division Bhadrachalam, Khammam District.

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not issuing transit permits for transportation of.the timber from petitioners patta lands as permitted by the 1st respondent in Rc.No.E2l1268l10 dt.31-05-2014 and as per the consequential order of the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.1201/2010N3 dt.02-O6-2O14 as illegal, arbitrary and capricious l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP.

NO: 2'1183 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to issue transit permits for transportation of the timber as per condition No.12 in Rc.No.'1201l20104/3 dt.02-06-2014 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.170 OO of 2Ol4 ORDER:

i When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri J. Srinesh, learned counsel representing Sri K. Chidambaram, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submit that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if aly, shall stand closed.

SD/- G. SIREESHA ASS]STANT REGISTRAR /ITRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri K Chidambaram,Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana.

3. Two CCs to GP For Forests, High Court for the State of Telangana. I

4. Two CD Copies to OU UT] TI MBC.

cJPd^.z-

HIGH COURT DATED: 2810312023 { ii /ttrl o_{ .\, o \,i2 B APR 2[Z] \i '\:

ORDER

WP.No.17000 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS a5 @@.

tv\ 8\.l\B t