← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/15704/2018disposed of no costs

Kandula Bakki Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

2018-04-30P Naveen Rao4 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO Dated:30.04.2018 Between:

Kandula Bakki Reddy, S/o. Late Nagi Reddy, Aged 48 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o: Chintalapalem Village and Mandal, Suryapet District.

... Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana State and others.

... Respondents The Court made the following:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2.

Petitioner alleges that he is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Acres 0.20 guntas in Survey No.142 of Chinthalapalem Revenue Village and Mandal, Suryapet District, having received the same as part of his share, vide registered partition deed dated 28.02.2013, after death of his father. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that though he made representation on 02.02.2018 and issued a legal notice on 06.03.2018 to the 4th respondent for grant of pattadar pass book and title deeds, so far the respondent authorities have not acted on the same. Hence, this writ petition is filed.

3.

Photo copy of the application and legal notice are enclosed from page Nos.22 to 25 of the material paper book. However, the respondent authorities are not accepting applications in physical form and insist for submission of such applications through online web portal. Apparently, so far no such application is made by the petitioner. Thus, it

cannot be said that the respondent authorities are negligent in not acting on the application made by her. 4.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to make application in Form VI-A through online web portal of the State Government and as and when such application is received, the competent authority shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law by assigning due reasons in support of his decision and communicate the said decision to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the application. There shall be no order as to costs.

5.

With the above directions, the Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed. ___________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J 30.04.2018 SS

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO 30th APRIL, 2018 SS