Touheed Ali Khan v. Syed Mahmood

[ 3208 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO: 205 0F 2010 Appeal under section 96 of C,i C- against-the Judoment and Decree Dated 11-12-2OOg made in O.S.No. ZOe oi)OOO o"n the file of th6 Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, R. R. DistrictBetween:

TouheedAliKhan,S/o'Mr'KhursheedAliKhanAgricultureandBusinessR/o, H.No. 47, MIGH, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad'

...APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF AND SvedMahmood,S/o.QasimSabR/oHNo1-g5,AdiacenttoOldMosque' lrrrbinauiO Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT Counsel for the Appellant : SRI' M M FIRDOS, (None appears ) Counsel forthe Respondent: SRl. M KRISHNA REDDY The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO. 205 OF 2O1O JUDGMENT:

Plaintiff filed O.S.No.268 of 2006 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District for Specific Performance and the same was decreed, against which the defendant therein preferred the present Appeal Suit before this Court.

2.

A perusal of the docket proceedings shows that the learned counsel for the appellants did not evince any interest to pursue the present appeal proceedings. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent is no more and memo was filed and the same was received by the counsel for the appellants. But so far, steps were not taken to bring LRs on record. On 21.08.2023 there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellantland the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation for the appellants. No purpose would be served in continuing the Appeal Suit. 3.

Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed. No order as to costs Pendin miscellaneous aDDlications, if any, shall stand closed |- Il/ SD/- B.S. CHIRANJEEVI, JOINT R GISTRAR.

i /TTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad, R.R.District.

2. One CC to SRl. M M FIRDOS, Advocate IOPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. M KRISHNA REDDY, Advocate [OPUCI

4. Two CD Copies ADK$\x

HIGH COURT DATED:2610912023 "(\\E- STAItJUDGMENT ,} qg E1 tEB 2024 t :tz AS.No.205 of 2010 * c{|r+ ',.\ ./ /)r DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS