Siby Mining And Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. The State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.18257 of 2019 DATED: 23-08-2019 Between :

Siby Mining and Infrastructure Pvt Ltd rep by its Siby Madathiparampil Lukose, S/o Lukose Thekkeparampil Pylo Aged about 52 years, R/o.Flat No.104, Sirisampada Hitech, Kavuri Hills, Serlingampally (M), Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad ..

Petitioner And The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department Secretariat Building,Sahibabad, Hyderabad and others. .. Respondents This Court made the following:-

- 2 - THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.18257 OF 2019 ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Transport.

2. Petitioner claims to have purchased BENZ GLS 350D 400 model car for an invoice price of Rs.84,01,899/-. At the time of purchase, petitioner claims to have paid life tax of Rs.11,79,405/- and was given temporary registration number as TS 09 CM TR 8784. Subsequently, when the petitioner approached the respondents to register the vehicle permanently, it was asked to deposit additional amount on ex-Showroom Price towards life tax holding that the petitioner paid less amount than the tax payable on ex-Showroom price of the vehicle. According to petitioner life tax is payable on the invoice but not on the ex-Showroom price and therefore petitioner is not required to pay the additional tax demanded.

3. In support of the claim that petitioner is not required to pay additional amount demanded by the respondents, learned counsel placed reliance on the decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018 which was upheld by the Division Bench in W.A.No.805 of 2018.

4. Learned Single Judge of this Court held that the State cannot be allowed to levy life tax on the ex-Showroom price shown in the price list, when it is not the actual cost of the vehicle and the life tax has to be levied on the actual cost of the vehicle as paid by the purchaser of the vehicle which can be

- 3 - reflected from the invoice. This view of learned Single Judge was upheld by the Division Bench of this Court.

5. Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the fact that the issue is covered by the decision referred to above.

6. Following the earlier decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018 dated 02.05.2018 this Writ Petition is also allowed directing the respondents to register the BENZ GLS 350D 400 model car of the petitioner without demanding additional life tax, if the life tax already paid based on the invoice dated 14.08.2019 is as per the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and the vehicle is fulfilling all other parameters for registration. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

___________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J 23-08-2019 Nvl