Anumula Kondal Reddy, v. The State Of Telangana And 2 Others

DATE : 27.08.2019 Between :

Anumula Kondal Reddy, s/o. Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 46 years, occu:Business, r/o.Flat No.403, Plot No.9, Kamala Aurum, Road No.70, HUDA Enclave, Jubilee Hills, Shaikpet Mandal, Hyderabad.

..... Petitioner and The State of Telangana, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, (Transport and R&B Department), Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others.

.... Respondents This Court made the following :

ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Transport.

2.

Petitioner claims to have purchased a Motor Car, i.e., JAGUAR XF 2.0L DIESEL PRESTIGE BSIV from M/s. Janguar Landrover Limited, for an invoice of  49,00,000/-. At the time of purchase, petitioner claims to have paid life tax of  6,86,000/-, and he was given temporary registration number as TS-09-BATR-8340.

When petitioner approached the respondents to register his vehicle permanently, he was asked to deposit an additional amount towards life tax holding that petitioner paid less amount than the tax payable on ExShowroom price of the vehicle. According to petitioner life tax is payable on the invoice but not on the ex-showroom price and, therefore, petitioner is not required to pay the additional tax demanded.

3.

In support of the claim that petitioner is not required to pay additional amount demanded by the respondents, he placed reliance on the decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018, which was upheld by the Division Bench in W.A.No.805 of 2018. 4.

Learned Single Judge of this Court held that the State cannot be allowed to levy life tax on the ex-showroom price shown in the price list, when it is not the actual cost of the vehicle and the life tax has to be levied on the actual cost of the vehicle as paid by the purchaser of the vehicle which can be

reflected from the invoice. This view of learned Single Judge was upheld by the Division Bench of this Court.

5.

Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the fact that the issue is covered by the decision referred to above. 6.

Following the earlier decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018 dated 02.05.2018, this Writ Petition is also allowed directing the respondents to register a Motor Car, i.e., JAGUAR XF 2.0L DIESEL PRESTIGE BSIV, with temporary registration number as TS-09-BATR-8340, without demanding additional life tax, if the life tax already paid based on the invoice dated 27.07.2017 is as per the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and the vehicle is fulfilling all other parameters for registration. Since the sale invoice is dated 27.07.2017 and the vehicle was not registered within 30 days from the date of temporary registration, petitioner may have to pay the penal charges for the delay in registration of the vehicle as levied and determined by the respondent authorities when the vehicle is presented for permanent registration. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date: 27.08.2019 kkm

DATE: 27.08.2019 kkm