V.K. Singh, v. State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 32es ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 20975 OF 2021 Between:
V.K. Singh, S/o. Late Sri Madhav Prasad Singh, Aged about 60 years, Occ: Retired, Rl./o. Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
...PET]TIONER AND
1. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad.
2. The Chief Secretary to Government, General Administration (Special-B Department), Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.
3. The Director General of Police, Telangana State
4. Accountant General of lndia, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.2 and 3 in not processing the pension application of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and u nco nstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to forthwith fix the pension of the petitioner and also release the retirement benefits of the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to process the pension application of the petitioner by duly fixing the pension amount of the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI REPRESENTING FOR M/s. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA Counsel forthe Respondents No.1 & 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR GENER,AL ADMINISTRATION Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: GP FOR FINANCE & PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGC I',\L W.P.No.2O975 of 2O2l ORDER:
Today, vhen the matter is called, the leamec t:outlsel lbr the petitioner seeks permission from this Court to viithdraw the writ pet ition with a liberty to pursue the rer rerdy before appropriate ar rthority.
2.
Taking -he above submission of the le:rrned courrsel lor the petitioner into consideration, this writ petition s dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy before the appropriate authorities.
3.
Accordir rgly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Miscella reous applications, if any pending, shall also stand dismissr:d.
SD/.1,. SIVA PARVATHI ASSI STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I ,i, .
SEC'IION gFFICER \\ To, One CC to M/:;. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA, Advocate OPU(ll Two CCs to G ) FOR HOME, High Court for the State of [elangana at Hyderabad [O JT] Trivo CC s to C p fOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, Hi(lh Court for the State of Telangana i rt Hyderabad [OUT] iwo cci to c P F'oR FINANCE d plRrurutruc, High court ror the state of Telangana at I lyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copie s BB GJP
HIGH COUR T DATED: 3011212.022 I SrAr6 iL I i;;
)
ORDER
[ \ rtB ?[E Ci WP.No.2097 i of 2021 \ ,.),.
\\: +. "
.*i_S E.! PA-r DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRI\WN WITHOUT C()STS Cgt{'* k"F