C Prakash, Hyd v. Shravan Badruka, Hyd And Another
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1 s4 0F 2016 Petition under Sectlon 22 of AP Building (Lease, Rent Eviction) Control Act, 1960, aggrieved against the Judgment dated. 26.10.2015 passed in RA.No. 176 of 2014 on the file of the court of the Additional chief Judge, city Small causes court, at Hyderabad, modifying the order dated.28.03.2014 passed in RC.178 of 2010 on the file of the court of the I Additional Rent controller, city small causes court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Chandra Prakash, S/o. Fatechand, Occ: Business in premises No' 15-9-483/1 , Mehboobgunj, Hyderabad.
...Revision/Petitioner/Respondent AND
1. Shravan Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, Oc,c: Business, H No' 8-2-686/9 and 10, Road.No. 12,Baniara Hills, Hyderabad.
2. Shvam Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, Occ: Business, H No 8-2-686/9 & 10' Ro'ad.No. 12, Baniaa Hills, Hyderabad ... Res pondents/AP Pe lla nt t.A. NO : 1 OF 2016(CRPMP. NO: 199 OF 2016 ) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased the order passed in R.A.No. 176 of 2014 dated 26.10.2015 passed by the Additional chief Judge, city small causes court, Hyderabad pending disposal of the Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s'DAMODAR MUNDRA Counsel for the Respondents: M/s R. A. ACHUTHANAND The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL RtrVISION PETITION NO.154 0F 2016 ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and, therefore, the Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pendin g shall stand dismissed. SD/.K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (i //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Additional Chief Judge, City Small Cayses Court, at Hyderabad.
2. The I Additional Rent Controller, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad.
3. One CC to M/s.DAMODAR MUNDdA, Advocare tOpUCl
4. One CC to M/s R. A. ACHUTHANAND, Advocata[OpUi]
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare Copy MMK -" TR A-.'
HIGH COURT DATED:3111212021
ORDER
CRP.No.'l 54 of 2016 itE $T4 16.
( Jo (.) 2 5 .lrr! 2i122 DISMIsSING THE clvlL REVISIoN PETITIoN,AS INFRUcTUoUS, frL 6i "''