Baldev Singh v. State Of Telangana
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8735 of 2017 ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed, by the petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 4, under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.29 of 2017 on the file of the Station House Officer, Mirchowk Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of IPC. 2.
The learned counsel for the petitioners strenuously submitted that the petitioners were falsely implicated in this case and hence this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
3.
Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners herein along with other accused created the cancellation deed dated 03.09.2016 by impersonation. 4.
It is the case of the prosecution that accused No.1 sold the property to the de-facto complainant under a registered sale deed dated 02.06.2012. It is the further case of the prosecution that the petitioners along with the other accused by impersonating the de-facto complainant executed the cancellation deed dated 03.09.2016. The gist of the allegations made in the complaint is that the petitioners along with the other accused forged the signature of the de-facto complainant and created the cancellation deed dated 03.09.2016.
5.
The petitioners filed Crl.M.P.No.2246 of 2017 under Section 438 Cr.P.C., on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for
Economic Offences, Hyderabad, and the same was dismissed on 25.07.2017.
6.
The petitioners filed Crl.P.No.6893 of 2017 and the same was dismissed by this Court on 05.09.2017 on the ground that the investigation is in progress.
7.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation is in progress. There are no changed circumstances from the date of dismissal of the previous petition till date. 8.
Taking into consideration the nature of the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners and the stage of investigation, this Court is of the considered view that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 9.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. ________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J Date: 24.10.2017 YVL
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8735 of 2017 Date:24.10.2017 YVL