Ravi Bhukya v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.9323, 10312, 11149, 16029, 19000, 22548, 24162, 24629, 25066, 28046, 30067, 31963, 31985, 32043, 32196, 33413, 33923, 35700, 36581, 42048, 45916 of DATED :14.06.2019 W.P.No.9323 of 2018 Between :

Mohd. Imran, S/o.Mohammed Osman, Aged 28 yrs, Occu : Driver-cum-Owner of the vehicle, R/o.H.No.9-2-50, Barakatpura Colony, Nizamabad. ..

Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others.

.. Respondents This court made the following :

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.9323, 10312, 11149, 16029, 19000, 22548, 24162, 24629, 25066, 28046, 30067, 31963, 31985, 32043, 32196, 33413, 33923, 35700, 36581, 42048, 45916 of 2018.

COMMON ORDER:

Heard.

2.

In all these writ petitions, petitioners were aggrieved by the action of respondents in not releasing the vehicles seized in exercise of power vested in them under the A.P.Excise Act. 3.

This Court granted interim direction with conditions to release the vehicles.

4.

Learned Government Pleader fairly submits that the confiscation proceedings are yet to be completed and vehicles are released in pursuant to the directions of this Court. He would further submit that in terms of the interim order the writ petitions may be disposed of giving liberty to the competent authority to continue the confiscation proceedings and to take further steps in accordance with the proceedings so finalized. 5.

In view of the said submission, all the Writ Petitions are disposed of making the interim order absolute. However, the confiscation proceedings may go on and further action as warranted by law against the petitioners shall be taken in accordance with the decision made in the confiscation proceedings. Pending miscellaneous petitions in these Writ Petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J 14th June, 2019.

Rds