← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaMACMA/2937/2019dismissed no costs

Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd v. Paidipally Akshith And 3 Others

2022-01-04G.Radha Rani,P Naveen Rao3 pages

[3244] HrcH couRr r?+ #s.rJfJ5DoF TELANGANA TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ruO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTTCE G.RADHA RAN| M.A.C.M.A. NO: 2937 0F 2019 Between:

llrqam General lnsurance ComqqlV !!d., Represented by its Manager(Legat), E_8, EPIP, Sitapur, Jaipur, Rajasth an-302- OO2.

...APPELLANT/ 2ND RESPONDENT AND Paidipally Akshith, S/o Late Janardhan Rao, Aged. 16 years, Occ. Student, Minor being rept. by his next friend and Maternal Grandmother Balguri Shyamala W/o Late Anand Rao, Aged. 50 Years, Occ. House hold, Rl/o. H. No. 1 1 -1 24, Vidyanasar, Khanapur Mandal, oo,,r::*-i3J;oo.;nu petitioner

2. Shaik lsmail, S/o Shiak Chotu, Aged. 43 Years, Occ. Business and Owner of the Tipper bearing no.AP 25 T 3223, R/o. H.No.6-23-344, Goutham Nagar, Nizamabad-503 001.

3. Mohammad Abdul Raheem, S/o MA.Khader, Aged. Major, Occ. Owner of the Car bearing no.AP 28 DM2292, Rl/o. H.No.20-169/2, Rahaman Nagar, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District-S01 218.

4. HDFC Ergo General lnsurance Compqny Ltd, Rept. by its Manager Legal, Registered Office, Raman House, HT Parekh Marg, 169, Back Bay Reclamassion, Mumbai-400 020.

...RESPONDENTS/ 1ST, 3RD & 4TH RESPONDENTS Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgmenV Order and decree made in MVOP No.457 of 2014 daled 1110212019 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- Vll Additional District and Sessions Judge, (FTC) at Nirmal.

ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and decree of the Lower Court and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Harinath Reddy soma, Advocate for the Appellant and of Sri N.Srushman Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and Sri.A.Ramakrishna Reddy, advocate for the Respondent No.4 and none appeared either by person or by Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3.

This Court rloth Orde and decree as follows :-

1. That the MAC /A be and hereby is dismissed

2. f hal there she ll be no Order as to costs. S,c r- i.K IlSHNA KUMAR .,[.PLTY REGISTRAR //TRI.JE COPYII sr,:116r.r oFFrcER To

1. The Chairmar fVotor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- \/ll Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC) at Nirmal.

2. f wo CD Copir s

3. One Spare Cr py K,1 *

HIGH COURT DATED:041A112022 /ar=:\-.

'-- { i: -i ".-\\ ,1 ,.;.L j "r-'\ 7\\!\\ sllilt .s s (.\ h.'

DECREE ,9/i/ MACMA.No.2937 ol 2019 DISMISSITIG THE N ACMA .rl-- I \ \ !

I )I