Gaddam Vilasa Reddy v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 34851
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENry NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO T-l ft OF il 9:91T Vilasa Reddy, S/o^Raji^Reddy, Aged 62 years, Occ Ex.Chairman, KC U B Ltd., R/o H. No. 8-3-2+yC j Bhagaih r.rijrr, rriirnrg"r. ENTjl P
1. The State of-Telangana,.R.en .bV its principal Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Secretariat, Hydeiabad.
2. The commissioner for cooperation and Registrar of cooperative societies (CC and RCS), Government of Tetangana, UyteirU"O.
3. The District Cooperative Officer (DCO), Karimnagar District, Karimnagar.
4. The. [ar.r.Lnaga1 Cooperative Urban Bank Ltd. (KCUB), 2_6_179t1, urban Bank Building, Karimnagar. Rep. by its presiOeni, RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 0f rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the Respondents in alrowing the current Managing committee of Respondent No. 4 Bank to continue in office despite the failure of the Generar Body Meeting dated 2g.03.2026 as iilegar, arbikary, and in violation of the TCS Act, 1964 and consequenfly Directing Respondent No. 2 to appoint a speciar officer t person-ln-charge under section 21-AA of the TCS Act, 1964 to manage the affairs of the Bank.
Petition under section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to forthwith Direct the Respondent No. 2 to appoint a speciar officer / person-rn-charge under section 21-AA of the TCS Act, 1g64 to manage the affairs of the Bank, continues to manage Bank funds, hord iilegar meetings, and draw sitting fees, causing ross to the Banks members, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the petitioner: SRt RAVINDER REDDY SINGIREDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.,t to 3: AGp FOR COOPERATTON The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD HO WRIT PETITION No.l68l5 of 2026 29th MAY,2026 Between:
Gaddam Vilasa Reddy, S/o.Raii Reddy.
Age 62 years, Occ: l:x-Chairman, KCUI] t.td., R/o.H.No. 8-3-243 lC, Bhagath Nagar, Karimnagar.
...Petitioner
and ) The State of Telangana.
Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Cooperation, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 3 others.
I,
...Respondents
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel for the petitioner seeks for permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to pursue other remedies available under law Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation appearing for respondent Nos.I to 3 takes no ob.iection to thc same. 3.
Permission is accorded
4.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty as sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if aoy, shall stand closed.
SD/.T. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcTto FICER To,
1. One CC to SRI RAVINDER REDDY SINGIREDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR COOPERATION, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies BSR BS I
I VACATION COURI i HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026 ltrE STA (
ORDER
Iro 16815 ot 2026 i!(., O E Jljl'l 202[ \ :t 1J .// 'y'
otsi'AicH I ISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION c O a,b b