High Court for State of TelanganaWP/18515/2017allowed no costs

Behara Tirumala Rao, S/O. Late Venkata Rao, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2017-06-30S.V.Bhatt4 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION Nos.21152, 21232, 17593, 16437, 16640, 16648, 17526, 16741, 17852, 17999, 18186, 18515, 18519, 18340, 18579, 18882, 18654, 18840, 19007, 19177, 19300, 19497, 19524, 19533, 19574, 19593, 19619, 19712, 19720, 19880, 19883, 20259, 20428, 20802, 20960 and 20976 of 2017 COMMON ORDER:

Heard learned counsel appearing for petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment. The petitioners in these writ petitions complain against the respondents herein and pray for Mandamus declaring Memo No.31617/ Regn.II/ A1/ 2012-4, dated 31.08.2015 and the action of respondents in not considering the applications of petitioners for renewal of licence to practice as Notary as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

Learned counsel rely upon common order dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and batch, wherein my learned brother Justice C.Praveen Kumar has considered the purport of Memo and the action of the respondents in not considering the applications filed for renewal and allowed the writ petitions. Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the circumstances in the case on hand and submits that the principle laid down by this Court does not apply to the present batch of cases.

I have perused the order and I am satisfied the instant batch of writ petitions can be allowed by following the order of this Court in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and batch dated 02.12.2016. The writ petitions are accordingly allowed in terms of W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and batch dated 02.12.2016. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. _____________ S. V. BHATT, J Dt: 30-06-2017 Prv