The Depot Manager A.P.S.R.T.C. v. The Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No. 20765 of 2002 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the record relating to and connected with I.D.No.278 of 1999 on the file of the 1st respondent-Labour Court and quash the award dated 27.02.2000 passed therein holding it as illegal and arbitrary.

Heard learned standing counsel for the petitioner corporation and Sri S.A.K. Mynuddin, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent. It has been contended by the petitioner corporation that the 2nd respondent workman was appointed as Driver in the corporation in the year 1995. While so, a charge sheet was issued to the 2nd respondent on 16.05.1998 on the ground that he submitted a fake driving licence. After initiating disciplinary proceedings and after conducting regular enquiry and for the proven misconduct, the disciplinary authority had removed him from service vide orders dated 19.09.1998. Questioning the same, the 2nd respondent unsuccessfully preferred an appeal and thereafter raised an industrial dispute in I.D.No.278 of 1999 on the file of the 1st respondent-Labour Court under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Labour Court without properly appreciating any of the contentions raised by the corporation, passed an award dated 27.02.2002 setting aside the order of removal and directing the corporation to reinstate the 2nd respondent into service

without back wages. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition is filed.

Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has contended that the Labour Court has rightly passed the award in favour of the 2nd respondent and, therefore, no interference is called for. This Court, having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, is of the considered view that the Labour Court has rightly passed the award in favour of the 2nd respondent. Further, no illegality or irregularity is pointed out by the learned standing counsel for the petitioner corporation in the award passed by the Labour Court. Unless and until any illegality or irregularity is pointed out by the learned standing counsel for the petitioner corporation in the award passed by the Labour Court, this Court cannot interfere with the award. There are no merits in the writ petition.

Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J 6th November, 2018 cbs

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Writ Petition No.20765 of 2002 (dismissed) 6th November, 2018 cbs