M.Rama Chandra Reddy v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
[ 3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19995 OF 2009 Between:
M.Rama Chandra Reddy, S/o.
Garden, harmanghat, Vaishali District.
Late Narsimha Reddy Business R/o Nagar Post, Saroornagar Mandal, C/o. Chandra Ranga Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, East Division, R.R.District, Goshamahal, Hyderabad.
The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Hayatnagar, R.R.District. Samreddy Muthyam Reddy, S/o. Late Penta Reddy Agriculture R/o. Bramhanpally Village, Hayatnagar [r/andal, R.R.Distrcit. S,.Narayana Reddy, S/o. Late Penta Reddy Agriculture Rl/o. Bramhanpally Viltage, Hayatnagar Mandal, R.R.District.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Prohibition restraining the 1st respondent herein from adjudicating the appeal No. A2i 1358 of 2009 filed under Sec. 5(5) of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act 1971 filed by the respondents 3 and 4 herein aggrieved by the order bearing proceedings No. 81126212008 dated 21-O3.2OO9 of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of O.S.No. 453 of 2008 on the file of the Court of I Additional District Judge, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2009(WPM P. NO: 26072 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in appeal No. A2l1358 of 2009 filed under Sec. 5(5) of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar pass Books Act .1971 filed by the respondents 3 and 4.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.3&4 : SRI M.V.DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE.I. SREEI{TVAS RAO Writ Petition No. 19995 of 2OO9 ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for consideration on 12.12.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give one opportunity, the matter is posted to 15.12.2023 under the caption "For Dismissal". 2.
Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, inspite of listing under the caption "For Dismissal". It appears that the petitioner is not having any interest in prosecuting the matter.
3.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
SD/- K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT IS //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY, Advocate. IOPUCI
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
3. One CC to SRI M.V.DURGA PRASAD, Advocate. [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies.
BSK GJ
HIGH COURT DATED:1 511212023 g.rATE 9a { ( o5 tq Ir\ $q S) *,
ORDER
tJ lr:, PA:I WP.No.19995 of 2009 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS @ a1v> GW