Karad Yashwanth v. State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3300 J
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION :17012OF 2026 Between Karad Yashwanth, S/o Ragunath, Age. 60, Occ. Agriculture R/o.H.No. 1-68, Gudihathnoor, Gudihathnoor Mandal, District Adilabad. ...PETITIONER AND
1. State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The District Collector, Adilabad, District.
The Tahsildar, Gudihatoor, Adilabad District The l.T.D.A, Utnoor, Adilabad, Adilabad District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondent No. 2 in not taking action pursuant to the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 18.05.2026 for not to take the subject property for the purpose agriculture market committee gudihatnoor, which is arbitrary. illegal and unjust and unconstitutional, violation of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the representation made by the petitioner and not to take the subject propefi for the purpose agriculture market committed gudihatnoor
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to consider representation dated 18.05.2026 and not to take the subject property for the purpose agriculture market committed gudihatnoor Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SOMA RAVI KIRAN REDDY Counse! for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Gourt made the following: ORDER
-
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No. t7ol2 of 2o26 29.05.2026 Between:
Karad Yashwanth
...Petitioner
AND State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dephrtment, Secre.tariht, Hyderabad and others.
...Respondents
;f ORNbR:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. He had also made an endorsement to the said effect on the bundle. 2.
Permission is accorded.
3.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD'. T. SRINIVASA REDDY STANT REGISTRAR lrnue coPYr SECTION OFFICER To,
2. One CC to SRl. SOMA RAVI KIRAN REDDY . Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE High Cou rt IoPUCI State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUTI . Two CD CoPies d BM GJP X,
VAGATION COURT I ) HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026 1'l+t s ..:ai /.!
') -.
ii
ORDER
B 6 JU,t Z[i[ i e.
WP.No.17012 ot 2026 ) t * ) DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS ,r-lT I I t+ 6 26