Smt Rizwana Begum, v. The State Of Telangana, Represented By Its Principle

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ***** Writ Petition No.14125 of 2015 Between:

Smt. Rizwana Begum, Sadasivapet, Medak District.

... Petitioner And The State of Telangana,, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Hyderabad and another.

....Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 21.07.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see the judgments? : Yes/No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No

3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the judgment?

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT Writ Petition No.14125 of 2015 PC: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Mr. N. Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2, at the outset, invited our attention to Rule 12 of the Taxation and Finance Rules, and submitted that a revision against the demand of tax, impugned in the present writ petition, is maintainable. Having confronted with this, Mr. Srinivas Reddy Balakisti, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned demand by way of revision.

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. If the revision is filed within a period of two weeks from today, the revisional authority shall consider and deal with the same on merits, in accordance with law, without entering into the issue of limitation.

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shall also stand closed.

____________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ _________________ S.V. BHATT, J

21st July, 2015 Pnb