Shaik Shadul @ Shadulla, v. State Of Telangana, Through Sho, P.S. Gajwel, Siddipet District,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8226 of 2026 DATE: 08.06.2026 Between:
Shaik Shadul @ Shadulla S/o Shaik Raheemoddin.
.... Petitioner/ Accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Through SHO, PS, Gajwel, Siddipet District.
.... Respondent Complainant
O R D E R
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/Accused seeking to enlarge him on bail in connection with S.C.No.72 of 2026 on the file of learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy, for the offences punishable under Section 103 of the BNS Act and Section 3 (2)(v) of the SCs&STs (POA) Amendment Act, 2015, arising out of Crime No.36 of 2026.
- 2 - 2.
The case of the prosecution is that the father of the deceased came to the police station and lodged a compliant on 31.01.2026, wherein it is stated that his daughter died due to accident and immediately he rushed to the hospital, where the police informed him that his daughter had met with an accident. It is further stated that the accused alleged to have had an argument with the deceased with regard to money and with an intention to kill her, the accused allegedly ran over a Bolero vehicle bearing No.TS-36TA-348 on her, as such he requested the police to take necessary action against the petitioner. Basing on the same police registered a case against the petitioner for the aforesaid offences.
3.
Heard Sri Kasireddy Mohan Chandra Has, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused and Sri M.Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondent-State.
4.
The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner-accused is that the petitioner is innocent of the offences alleged against him; that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 01.02.2026; that entire investigation is
- 3 - completed and charge sheet is filed and hence he requested the Court to grant regular bail to the petitioner. 5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the same and submits that the offence committed by the petitioner is brutal murder and killed the deceased by pushing her on the road and ran over Bolero vehicle over, resulting her death; that though investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed, there is threat to the witness in the hands of the petitioner and hence he prays this Court to dismiss the petition.
6.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for both parties and perusal of the material on record, it shows that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 01.02.2026 and there is prior acquaintance of the petitioner with the deceased and the accused had physical relationship with the deceased and on the date of accident they influenced alcohol. Considering the allegations made against the petitioner and the as entire investigation is completed and it was numbered as Sessions Case No. 72 of 2026, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner/Accused subject to the following conditions:
- 4 - (i) The petitioner-accused shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy.
(ii) On such release, the petitioner-accused shall appear before the Court concerned on each and every date of hearing.
(iii) The petitioner-accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437 (3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480 (3) of BNSS).
7.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 08.06.2026 YVL