← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/456/2017allowed no costs

C. Lalithamma, v. The State Of Telangana,

2018-01-05M.Satyanarayana Murthy2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.A.Nos. 1 & 2 OF 2018 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.456 OF 2017 ORDER:

I.A.Nos. 1 & 2 OF 2018 These miscellaneous petitions are filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C seeking permission to compromise and compound the offences to quash the proceedings in Crime No.760 of 2016 on the file of Malkajgiri Police Station, Rachakonda, Ranga Reddy District, for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 506 r/w 34 IPC & Sections 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

The petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 5 and the second respondent/defacto complainant are present and they are identified by their respective counsels and produced Photostat copies of Aadhar cards to prove their identity. A joint memo of compromise dated 04.01.2018 is filed by both the parties, when terms of joint memo of compromise are explained in Telugu language, they are admitted to be true and correct. It is submitted that the second respondent/defacto complainant voluntarily entered into compromise due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they wanted to lead peaceful life.

Therefore, I find that the compromise is voluntary in the interest of both parties and permission is granted to compound the offences. Hence, compromise is recorded in terms of the joint

MSM,J CrlP_456_2017 memo dated 04.01.2018 filed along with these petitions. Accordingly, these petitions are ordered.

Crl.P.NO.456 OF 2017 In view of the orders passed by this Court in I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2018, this criminal petition is allowed. Registry is directed to annex a copy of joint memo filed by both the parties, to this order.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand closed. No costs.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date:05.01.2018 SP