← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/18283/2024withdrawn

Cholleti Mahesh Babu v. The State Of Telangana

2024-11-28T.Vinod Kumar4 pages

[ 3166 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 18283 OF 2024 Between:

Cholleti Mahesh Babu, S/o. Narasimha Chary, Aged about 50 years, Occ Joumalist, Ri/o. Plot No.123, Behind Loyola High School, Hayath Nagar, Ranga Reddy District 501505 ..'ET'T'ONER AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secreiariat buitding, Secretariq!, Hyderabad ThA Director School Education,Telangana State, Hyderabad. The District Collector,, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District The District Educational Offlcer,, Ranga Reddy, Ranga Reddy District. The Mandal Education Officer,, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District M/s. Candor Shrine I Senior Secondary School, Abdullapurmet Mandal' Ranga Reddy Dist., Represented by its Correspondent E.Malla Reddy.

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 and 4 in non-considering the representations of the Petitioner dated 20.05.2024, 07.05.2024 and non initiating to direct the respondent No.6 to provide the education with admission to the Petitioner's daughter Cholleti Srieejja, who wants to study the 5th class under the free and compulsory education of 25 percentage Quota by implementing the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009 in the school of the Respondent No.

6 is illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14, 15,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia, also violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009 and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 to consider the representations of the Petitioner dated 20.05.2024, 07.05.2024 and to direct the respondent No.

education with admission to the Petitioner's daughter Cholleti Srieejja, who wants to study the 5th class under the free and compulsory education of 25 percentage Quota by implementing the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009 in the school of the Respondent No.6.

lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 to consider the representations of the Petitioner dated 2010512024, 0710512024 and to direct the respondent No.6 to provide the education with admission to the Petitioners daughter Cholleti Srieejja, who wants to study the 5th class under the free and compulsory education of 25 percentage Quota by implementing the provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009 in the school of the Respondent No.6 and pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,2,4 & 5: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BI.?E SRI JIJSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.18283 OF 2o24 ORDER:

After making initial submissions and on this Court pointing out that the petitioner is not entitled to seek admission into the 6s respondent school to study 5ft class under 25o/o quota in terms of Section 12 of Right of Children to free and Compulsory Education Act, 2OO9, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2.

Learned Government Pleader for Education appearing for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.3 have no objection for withdrawal of the Writ Petition by the petitioner. 3.

Granting permission as sought, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Miscellancous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition, shall stand closed SD/.P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSTSTANT,REGTSTRAR ',1 rT)i/L sEonoN oFFrcER To \ //TRUE COPY// One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate IOPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI Two CD Copies PSK.

PSK - -. - .. ----'-{-^ w _*€r--.-*:+.*'*=--F_"

-

HIGH COURT DATED:2811112024 ()^-( r.

HE S rA, ( (

ORDER

17 DEt 2i.i4 o WP.No.18283 ot 2024 ('

t Itaf cr.t f.\l )t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

;

I I s c'lw vX- \ I i