Mohammed Zakir Ullah Siddqi v. The State Of Telangana

[ 33E5 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TfIE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT, JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7689 OF 2024 Between:

Mohammed Zakir Ullah Siddqi, S/o about 38 years, Occ: Business, Hyderabad.

Mohammed Asas Ullah Siddiqul, aged Rl/o. H.No.22-7-700, Miralam Mandi, ... Petitioner/Accused AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for state of Telangana.

2. Smt. Shakuntala Devi, Wo. Sri. Babulal, age 75 years, Occ:Household, R/o. 2-3-577, Flat No. 101 , Uttam Towers, D.V. Colony, Minister Road, Secunderabad.

..Respondent Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the criminal petition and quash the C.C.No.397 of 2019, dated 17.10.2017 on the file of XXll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad at Secunderabad, against the petitioner.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of petitioners in C.C.No.397 of 2019 dated 17.1O.2O17 on the file of XXll Additional Metropolitan Ivlagistrate, Secunderabad at Secunderabad, pending disposal of criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri L Ram Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner, the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7689 of 2024 ORDER:

In this criminal petition, the petitioners, who are accused No.S, seek to quash the proceedings against him in C.C'No.397 of 2O 19 pending on the file of the XXII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.

2.

After arguing for some time, when this Court has expressed its opinion stating that the said contentions are disputed questions of fact which need to be gone into by the trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioners restricted their prayer to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the trial Court. 3.

Hence, if there are no warrants issued against the petitioners, the appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court is dispensed with unless their presence is specifically required during the course of trial, subject to the condition of petitioners being represented by their counsel on every date of hearing.

4.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Criminal Petition shall also stand closed.

SD/. A.V.S. PRASAD, ASSTSTANT REGrS/RAR.

\i //TRUE COPY// 4/ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XXll Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad at Secunderabad

2. The Station House Officer, Ramgopalpet Police Station, Hyderabad

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC tc Sri L

5. Two CD Copies vocate [OPUC] Ram Singh, -*:{ ADK

HIGH COURT DATED:1210712024 -----:= .;

--.:rr'

f:6^----.-\ ttl\ i'j e t)c

ORDER

15 '\\]t CRLP.No.7689 ot 2024 ,-.,,1 . .,, r .

-' ur''

a DISPOSING OF THE CRLP