Manthri Narsimloo And 2 Others v. The Governmetn Of A.P., Rep By Secy., And 4 Others

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 4766 OF 2008 Between:

1. Manthri Narsimloo, Sio Rajaiah (Late), Shameerpet, R.R. District.

2. Manthri Gnaneswar S/o Laxminarayana Aliyabad, Shameerpet, R.R. District.

3. Manthri Goverdhan S/o Laxminarayana (late), Agriculture, R/o 6-65, Aliyabad, Shameerpet, R.R. District.

Agriculture, R/o 6-65, Aliyabad, (Late), Agriculture R/o 6-65, ...PETITIONERS AND '1 . The Government of Andhra Pradesh,rep by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Diskict Collector, Ranga Reddy Diskict,, at Hyderabad.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officeriland Acquisition Officer, East Division, Gosha Mahal, Hyderabad

4. The Tahsildar/Mandal Revenue Officer, Shameer Pet Mandal, R.R. District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that. in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the property of the petitioners to an extant of Ac. 5-00 Guntas in Sy. No. 663 situated at Lalgadi Malakpet Village, Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District is illegal, biased and void and consequently direct the respondents herein to utilize the Government poramboke lands situated inthe same village for the purpose of house sites.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI GADE VENKATESWARA RAO (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR W.P. No.4766 of 2OO8 ORDER:

On the earlier occasion on 05.O9 .2022 there was no representation for the petitioner(s) and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal. Accordingly, the matter has been listed today under the caption for dismissal. Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner(s) in the pre lunch as well post lunch and therefore, there is no other option to this Court except to dismiss the writ petition for default.

Accordingiy, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

SD/-I. NAGALAKSHMI l/ //TRUE COPY// DEPUry REGISTRAR sEcrioN'oFlicJ* "

To, One CC to SRI GADE VENKATESWABA RAO,Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the GP for Revenue, High Court for'the State oiteLnlana IOUT] Two C.D. Copies.

One Spare Copy.

J.

4.

MRC GJP EK-

\ HIGH COURT DArED:1310912022 at 5 iAr;: o:

"I\ c+ \irL Ntt OROER '.lr WP.No.4766 of 2008 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS !

-t9o ,5 sY--