Boddu Goutham v. Convenor, Ecet Examinations, Hyderabad.

l32s2l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17736 OF 2014 Between:

Boddu Goutham, S/o Boddu Anand, Aged 17 years, Occ: Student, Rl/o Sri Anandnagar Colony, tVlallapur, Hyderabad, Rep. by his father, Sri Boddu Anand'

...PETrroNER AND 1 . Convenor, ECET Examinations, Hyderabad.

2. TRR College of Technology, 4-202, IVleerpet, Saroomagar Mandal Hyderabad Represented by its Secretary.

3. State Board of Technical Education, Rep by its Secretary, Government of Telangana' Hyderabad ...RES'.NDENT.

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting instant examination for allowing the Petitioner to.complete and clear the backlog subject and in further not allowing the Petitioner to attend the counseling for admission into engineering college on 28.6.2O14 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently, direct the respondents to conduct the examination and allow the petitioner to attend the counseling session scheduled to take place on 28.06.2O14.

l.A. NO: 2OF 2014(WPM P. NO:22216 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to attend the counseling of ECET scheduled to 28.O6.2014, pending disposal of the writ petition.

l.A. NO: 1OF 2014Mol/MP. NO: 1989 OF 2014) Between:

Convenor, ECET Examinations, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERY RESPONDENT AND 'I . Boddu Goutham, S/o Boddu Anand_ ...RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER

2. TRR College of Technology, 4-202, Meerpet, Saroornagar Mandal Hyderabad Represented by its Secretary.

3. State Board of Technical Education, Rep by its Secretary, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS (Respondents No.2 & 3 are not necessary parties to this Wp.Mp.) Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 27to612o14 passed in the writ petition No.17736 of 2o14 by the Hon'ble High Court.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI TARUN G. REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE, SC FOR OU Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI p.V.S.S.S:RAMA RAO, SC FOR TSTEB Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: - The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION No.17736 OF 2OL4 @EE:

I i The petitioner approached this Court seeking the I t relief as under:

"To issue a Writ order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not conducting instant examination for allowing the Petitioner to complete and clear the backlog subject and in further not allowing the Petitioner to attend the counseling for admission into engineering college on 28. 06.2Ol4 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently, direct the respondents to conduct the examination and allow the petitioner to attend the counseling session scheduled to take place on 28.06. 2Ol4 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. "

I i 2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner brings to the notice of this Court that the cause of action in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication any more.

3.

Bringing the said submission on record, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order granted

,w 5A,'

earlier on 27.06.2OL4 shall stand vacated. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

SDA K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// Loil orr SECTI ICER To 1. One CC to SRI TARUN G. REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI P.V.S.S.S.RAMA RAO, SC FOR TSTEB [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRI DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE, SC FOR OU [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies PSK GJP

I , I HIGH COURT DATED:2811212023 STATe vr€ v

ORDER

2 7 Jrll 202[ C) o t , WP.No.17736 of 2014 6,$ DESPAT DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

w{o Qrz.- Ir\\"a-