B.Ravi Kumar, v. The Singareni Collieries Company Limited Rep.By Its

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE S.V.BHATT W RI T PETI TI ON No.4 5 4 4 0 of 2 0 1 6 ORDER:

Heard Mr. R. Sujan Kumar for petitioner and J. Srinivasa Rao for respondents 1 to 4.

2.

Counsel representing the parties submit that the prayer in the instant writ petition is covered by the common order dated 30th March, 2011 in WP.No.11107 of 2009 and batch and further by following the order dated 30.03.2011, a few writ petitions are also disposed of.

The writ petition is disposed of by this order: a) The Regional Commissioner or any Officer authorized by him shall first issue a notice to the petitioner to decide whether the activity undertaken by the petitioner comes within the definition of Coal Mine. It shall be open to the petitioner to submit explanation;

b) In the event of the activity being declared as the one in coal mine, the employees shall be enrolled as members, subject to their fulfilment of the prescribed conditions, the respondents shall assign account numbers and issue cards; and the deductions shall be made with reference to the account numbers and cards so issued, periodically;

c) Till such time, no deductions shall be made, but if it is held that the petitioner is liable, at a later point of time, he shall be under obligation to pay the arrears also; d) The amount deducted from the petitioner, so far, shall be kept in FDRs and the manner in which it shall be

utilized shall be decided, depending upon the outcome of the exercise undertaken above; and e) The authority of the coal mines provident fund shall ensure that it does not deduct any amount, without reference to a particular employee, who is admitted to the provident fund."

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________ S. V. BHATT, J December 26, 2016 DSK