Burri Ramaiah , v. The Chairman And Managing Director,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
i [ 3384 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD | (Special Original Jurisdiction) i FRIDAT THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI tJ*,, "ar'r,oN No: 16750 oF 2018 Between:
t,II blo. afreemaiah, E.C.No.2827872, Aged about 59 years, RK-8 lncline, Srirampur Projects, Rl/o. Mulkala, (Village and I (Mandal), Adilabad District.
l'
...pETlroNER Burri Ramaiah, I Occ. Coal Filler, i Post), Mancheria AND l
1. The Chairman aJ d Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Singareni Bhavan, Read Hills, Hyderabad.
2. The Director (PAland W), The Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), Kothagudem, Khhmmam District.
3. The General Manager (Personnel), Welfare and CSR, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Welfare Wing. Corporate Personnel Department, Singareni Bhavan, Hyderabad.
4. The Chief n4eOicAt Officer, The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.
I r ...RESPoNDENTS Petition under driicte 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stateO firh the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue to a wtit, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus dJclaring that the acts, deeds and things of the Respondents in not call for the Peti{ioner for Examination by the Corporate Medical Board to evaluate the Fitness olf th" P.titioner as per the Mines Act 1952 and its Rules 1955 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently declare that Petitioner is unfit for the service of the Respondent.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under S ction 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in Ie the affidavit titeO in sufi6rt of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.a tblbonduct Medical Examination as per Mines Act 1952 and its 1955 pending OispolJt of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the PetitiJnrer: SRI CH. VENKAT RAMAN lr Counsel for the Respdndents: P SRI HARSHA REDDY (SC FOR SINGARENI coLLtERtES CO.LTD) The Court,,"a. *r" J lowing: ORDER
THE HON,BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRJT PETITION No.1675O of 2018 ORDER:
It is submitted by Shri G.Mohan Sai Baba, learned counsel representing Shri Ch.Venkat Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner that due to efflux of time, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive and the same has become infructuous In vieq, of the sa-:le, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Ther:e shali be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if aly, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.P.PADMANABAHA REDDY ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR WSECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY// . One CC to Sri C . Venkat Raman, Advocate loPUCl . One CC to Sri P loPUcl . Two CD Copies Sri Harsha Reddy (SC for Singareni Collieries Co.LTD) TJ SB ,fu-
HIGH COURT t DATED:291121 023 t "t--,,'''t'\ (t' ou *'u'** ^3) k<uo'/'
i
ORDER
WP.No.16750 li lE WRIT PETITI ON bt.
DISMISSING TI AS INFRUCTU J+ WITHOUT CO S.
t0 b\ @tq* C"g-