Shaik Rahamthulla v. Uyyalawada Haseena Begum

SMT JUSTICE T.RAJANI CRIMINAL PETITION No.8395 of 2013 ORDER:

This petition is filed seeking for quash of the proceedings against the petitioner, who is A6, in C.C.No.275 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jammalamadugu. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 498‐A, 406, 506 and 509 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2.

Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the Public Prosecutor appearing for the 2nd respondent and Sri Soma Venkateswarlu, the counsel for the 1st respondent.

3.

The Public Prosecutor files a memo stating that the matter underwent trial and, ultimately, A1 was convicted and the other accused were acquitted by judgment, dated 03.03.2016, passed by the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Jammalamadugu. 4.

Hence, in view of the above, no cause of action survives for adjudication and no further orders are necessary. 5.

Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

__________ T. RAJANI, J September 12, 2018 v v