Dasari Boomaiah v. The State Of Telanagana

132s1 1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REvtsION CASE NO: 1238 OF 2018 Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Criminal Procedure Code against the Order dated.22-03-2018 made in Crl.M.P.No 1oG of 2017 in S.C.No. 368 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Manthanti Between:

Dasari Boomaiah, S/o. Ramaiah, Aged. 55 Years, lnspector of Police Now at Adilabad,

...Petitioner/Accused.

AND

1. The State of Telanagana, Through Station House Officer Manthani' Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

2. Veldi Mahalaxmi, Wo. Sudhkar, Age.ssYears, Rl/o.Gunjapadugu Village of Manthani Mandal, Peddapalli District.

...Respondents

lA NO: 1 OF2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in S.C.No,368 of 2016 on the file of the Assistant Seisions Judge at Manthani pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent No.l: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/s. P.V. Nagamani, The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI ]USTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1238 OF 2018 II !

ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.) by the petitioner-accused to set aside the order dated 22.03.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.106 of 2017 in S.C.No.368 of 2016 by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Manthani, and consequently discharge the petitioner and acquit him of charge. 2.

Heard. Perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is not pressing for the relief of discharging the petitioner. However, he seeks intervention of this Court to direct the Court concerned to dispose off the above case expeditiously since the case is of the year 2016. 4.

In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, since the sessions case is of the year 2016, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Court concerned to undertake the trial on day to day basis as required under Section 309 of Cr.p.C. and dispose of the above sessions case as expeditiously as possible

within a period of four (4) months, in accordance with law, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above observation, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

Mirellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. T. KRISHNA KUMAR OEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// _GD SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Assistant SessionsJudge, at Manthani, Karimnagar Diskict (With Records)

2. One CC to SRl. G V SHIVAJI Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to lvUs. P.V.NAGAMANI, Advocate (OPUC)

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, [OUTI

5. Two CD Copiesl isr \V i 1l

HIGH COURT i DATED:22lOGl2o23 i i Ii i6 ST.1I.:

(L o ?i e

ORDER

,12 AUc zul o() CRLRC.N6.1238 of 20'tB { l ''..

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISPOSED OF