M/S.Lalamma v. Government Of Andhra Pradesh,

[ 33021

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: '11544 OF 2011 Between:

M/s. Lalamma, Gardens Welfare Association Rep. by its Secretary, Sri V. Bhaskar Rddy, 2411, Street No.3 Lalmma Gardens, Puppalaguda Village, Rajaendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District- ...PETITIONER AND Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, At Secretariat, Hyderabad District Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy District at Nampally, Hyderabad The Commissioner Panchayat Raj Department, Urdupally, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad J The Panchayat Secretary, Puppalagunda Grampanchayat, Rajendra Naga(lt/), Ranga Reddy District M/s.Suresh Productions Pvt Ltd, rep.by its Sri D.Suresh Babu, Ramanaidu, Studios, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue direction or any other or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned memo dt.5-03-2011 issued by the respondent No.2 allowing respondent No.S to use public road in petitioners Society as a private and exclusive approach to his property in Sy No.104/A at Puppalaguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as being illegal and arbitrary by and set-a-aside impugned memo dt 5-03-2011. l.A. NO: 1OF 2011(WPMP.

NO: 14125 OF 20111 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Suspend impugned memo dt 05-03-2011 issued by the respondent No. 2 allowing the respondent No.

his property in Sy No.104/A at Puppalaguda Village, Rajendranagar Nilandal, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. SHASHIDHAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI P. RAGHAVENDER REDDY, SC FOR TG-MPPS GPPS Counsel for the Respondent No.5: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER

./ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.l1544 of 2OLl ORDER:

This petition is coming for hearing since 2011. On 22.11.2023, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.

2.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. There shall be no order as to costs.

3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this petition, shall stand closed.

SD/.T.JAYASREEE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR aa-"=-- SECTION OFFICER \ /ffRUE COPY// To,

1. One CC to SRI G. SHASHIDHAR REDDY, AdvocateIOPUC] i. i;; cc.i"-GiFoi pAlrdnnvAr RAJ, High court fbr the state of Telansana. [OUT] : o""6 ct io dnt pl nncHnve NDER REDDY, sc FoR rG-MPPS GPPS toPUCl

4. Two CD CoPies BN SS

HIGH COURT DATED:1311212023 ;- $TATE o ( ,-) 0 g lltl 2[?{ ,l

ORDER

.// t * DtsPATC WP.No.11544 of 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS ),,o)Z