C Rama Murthy, Hyd v. Shravan Badruka, Hyd And Another
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 53 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 o'f lhe Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 26.10.2014 in R.A.No.173 ol 2014 on the file of the Court of the Addl. Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Between:
C. Rama Murthy, S/o. C. Eshwaraiah, aged 58 years, Occ: Business' R/o. 15-9-482, Mehboobgund, Hyderabad.
...REVISION PETITIONERYRESPONDENT AND
1. Shravan Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, aged 42 years, Occ: Business,
2. Shyam Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, age.d 41 years, Occ: Business,. Boih residents H.No.8-2-686/9/9 & 10, Road.No.12, Banlara Hills, Hyderabad. ,..RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT cRPMP. NO: 75 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order passed in RA.No.173 of 2014 dated: 26.10.2015 passed by the Hon'ble Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DAMODAR MUNDRA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. A. ACHUTHANAND The Court made the following: ORDER
I THE HON'B,E DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVII REVISION PETITION NO.53 OF 2016 ORDER:
Learned cc unsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settler. between the parties and, therefore, the Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed, Recording -he said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infr uctuous.
There shr ll be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if a ry, pending shall stand dismissed. SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Additional Cl rief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad
2. One CC to Sri Dt modar Mundra, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri R. A. Achuthanand, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies
5. One Spare CoPy obr d"
I HIGH COURT DATED: 31l12li'021 $E Sia .t-)o() 0 7 trl 2fl22
ORDER
CRP.No.53 of 2016 DISMISSING TlIE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS 4t