Vadde Govindhu v. The State Of Telangana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6571 OF 2020 Between:
'1 . Vadde Govindhu, S/o Vadde Narsappa, age: 56 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o Penchikalapadu Village of Gattu Mandal Jogulamba Gadwal District.
2. Smt. Jammulamma, Wo Vadde Govindhu, age: 45 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o Penchikalapadu Village of Gattu Mandal Jogulamba Gadwal District.
3. Gouri @ Vadde Manjula, W/o Vadde Savaranna,Age: 23 years, Occ: Agriculture, r/o H.No.8-77l1, B.C. Colony, Gattu village and Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District
4. Savari @ V. Savaranna, S/o. V. Anjaneylu, Age: 23 years, Occ: Agriculture, r/o H.No.8-77l1, B.C. Colony, Gattu Village and Mandal Jogulamba Gadwal District.
5. Venkateshwalu @ V.Venkatesh, S/o.Ramudu, age: 35 years, Occ: Agriculture, rio H.No.5-5-101, Vadei Street, Gadwal Rural, Jogulamba Gadwal District. ...PETITIONERYACCUSED No.2 to 6 AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad.
2. KuNa Narsimulu, S/o Budda Savaranna, age: 50 years, Occ: Agricluture, r/o Madehlabanda village of Maldakal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal.509132. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash FIR No.209 ot 2020, dated 15/10/2020 against the petitioner/Accused No.2 to 6 of P.S. Maldakal.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceeding in FIR No.209 of 2020, dated 1511012020 against the petitioner/Accused No.2 to 6 of P.S. Maldakal. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G. Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf ofthe Respondent No.1 and none appeared forthe Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER c IMINAL PE TIONN .657Lof20 o
ORDER
This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code oF Criminal Procedure, Lg73, i5 filed by the petitioners, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No'209 of 2020 of Maidakal (M) Police Station, Jogulamba Gadwal District' 2.
Heard. Perused the record'
3. In the course of submissions, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor' that charge-sheet has been filed in the subject crime before the Court concerned and the Special Sessions Case is numbered' 4.inviewoftheaboveSubmission,nothingsurvivesfor adjudication in this Criminal Petition'
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous However, the petitioners are at liberty to work out the remedies available under law'
in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending Petition shall stand closed.
SD/.B.SATY AVATHI ./ ISTRAR ,/ //TRUE COPY// ASS]lSTANT REG SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Gadwal'
2. The Station House Officer' Jogulamba Gadwal'
3. One CC to Sri G. Rajeshwar Rao' Advocate [OPUC] 4.TwoCCstothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad. [OUTI
5. Two CD CoPies \
6. One SPare CoPY \;Pa"
gbr
HIGH COURT DATED: 10912021 a rrr STAf4'
z) 1) -1 2$ oEI202l .A N
ORDER
Dr,sp$ CRLP.No.6571 of 2020 DISMISSING THE CRL.P AS INFRUCTUOUS X6-