Sri Yalla Srinivas Reddy v. The Station House Officer

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 22100 OF 2021 Between:

Sri Yalla Srinivas Reddy' S/o. Malla Reddy, H.No. 10.2-786/2, Vidya Nagar, Karimnagar District ...PETITIONER AND l.TheStationHouseOfficer,NearZPQuarters'ProhibitionandExciseStation Karimnagar Urban.

2. The Excise Superintendent, Prohibition Excise Department' Collectors - Complex Building' Karimnagar District

3. The District Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District

4. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary' Probation Excise Department, Secretariat Hyderabad'

5. The lnspector General, Prohibition and Excise Department Hyderabad' 6.TheStationHouseOfficer,llTownPoliceStationKarimnagar'Karimnagar District.

7. Satva Wines, Fl/p by its Proprietor, Muduganti Krishna Reddy' S/o Hanumanth ' ile;y:ii.No'.iolz:740, Vidva Nagar, Karimnagardistrict' ,,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Artlcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesStatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleasedtoissueaWritororderordirectionsmoreparticularlyinthenatureof WritofMandamusdeclaringtheactionoftheofficialRespondentsinnottaking anyactionagainsttheTthRespondentbycancellinghislicenseandnotpassing anyordersofpetitionercontinuousrepresentationssubmittedfromtimetotime i.e.. o5lo7t2o21 , 2710112021 and 14108t2021 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law' unconstitutional,discriminativeinnatureandvioativeofArt'19and21ofthe Constitution of India, in the interest of justice'

'IA No 10F"Z021 in the circumstances stated "n 'Cout may be Pleased. to petitio n under sectionJ !|,fiI;"?lill:?#il H: ?I". ?iii+i!hl:ff{"1{ jl :"r,:::i,:'"':

:fli iXt["d,'i Ti'ii'Ti'i;;;'i or justiie ,E:"m,zs;:' ;,'"^ f ;iz\ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M'V'RAJA RAAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos'1'2'4'5: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE Counsel for the Respondent No'3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No'6: GP FOR HoME Counsel fo'r the Respondent No'7: -..

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No. 22LOO of 2O2L ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings in view of the subsequent developments. 2.

Granting liberty as sought for, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. l-1. ConscqucrnLlr', mrsccllancous pcutions pending, il ar-lt,, sl'r:r li stri ncl closccl.

SDI M.SANTHI DHANI JOINT ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, l.TwoCCStotheGPforProh.&Excise,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana TOUTI z. iir"o'dC. to the Gp for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana.[OUT]

5. i;; ca; 6 ih; GP for Home, High bourt for the-State of Telangana [oUT] +. On" CC to Snt M.V.RAJA F{AAN/, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two C.D. CoPies.

6. One Spare CoPY.

I\NRC SB LHE

HIGH COURT DATED:0610412022

ORDER

WP.No.22100 of 2021 ci ,.L {r:i'

\o / DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS k $losl't'