Smt. Devavarapu Sri Lakshmi, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Civil Supplies Department,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.31786 OF 2016 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the fourth respondent in not supplying the essential commodities to petitioner's Fair Price Shop No.32 of Satyavaram Village, Payakaraopeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as illegal and arbitrary.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh) representing the respondents 1 to 4.

It is the case of the petitioner that she was appointed as Fair Price Shop Dealer in respect of Shop No.32 of Satyavaram village, Payakaraopeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, in the year 2004. It is the further case of the petitioner that she has been distributing the essential commodities to the Card Holders without any complaint whatsoever for all these years. A perusal of the record reveals that on 11.07.2016 the Civil Supplies Deputy Tahsildar, Nakkapalli, inspected the premises of the petitioner and found some variation in the stock.

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the authorization of the petitioner in respect of Shop No.32 of

Satyavaram village, Payakaraopeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District is in subsistence as on today. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that so far the third respondent has not suspended the authorization of the petitioner. So long as the authorization of the petitioner is subsisting, the fourth respondent is bound to supply essential commodities to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to the Full Bench Judgment of this court in Olet i Tirupat hamma v Dist rict Supply Officer (Cit y), Visakhapat nam1 wherein it was held that the licensing authority refusing to supply essential articles to dealer without suspending his licence is illegal. The facts of the case on hand are almost identical to the facts of the case cited supra.

It is the grievance of the petitioner that the licensing authority is not supplying the essential commodities to her without suspending or canceling her license. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the principle enunciated in the case cited supra, the fourth respondent is hereby directed to supply the essential commodities to the petitioner's Fair Price Shop No.32 of Satyavaram village, Payakaraopeta Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, so long as her authorization is in subsistence.

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. The disposal of this writ petition does not preclude the 1 2002(1) ALD 577(FB)

respondents to take any action against the petitioner in accordance with law. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. _______________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J 23.09.2016 Note:

Issue C.C. within one week.

B/ o.Rns.