Smt. Patoju Indira Devi, v. J.Nivas,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Between:

Smt. Patoju Indira Devi and others

...Petitioners

and Sri J.Nivas

...Respondent

DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 11.09.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments? Yes/No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No

3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment? Yes/No

Between:

Smt. Patoju Indira Devi and others

...Petitioners

and Sri J.Nivas

...Respondent

COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS : SRI M.V.HANUMANTHA RAO COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT : NONE APPEARS

ORDER:

This Contempt Case is wholly misconceived as Contempt Case No.1480 of 2015 filed by the petitioners with the grievance that no final order was passed as directed by this Court in Writ Petition No.22134 of 2014, was disposed of by placing on record the fact that final order was passed on 15.07.2015.

In the present Contempt Case, the petitioners pleaded that though final order was passed on 15.07.2015, before passing such order, no enquiry was conducted under Section 11(a) of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act').

In my opinion, if the final order passed by the respondent is not in accordance with the provisions of Section 11(a) of the Act, proper remedy for the petitioners is to question the same by invoking statutory remedy, as already observed by this Court while dismissing Contempt Case No.1480 of 2015.

For the above-mentioned reasons, the Contempt Case is dismissed.

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 11th SEPTEMBER, 2015.

kvni