M/S Sichi Bio Technology, v. The Commissioner And Director Of Agriculture

[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 6756 OF 2012 Between:

M/s Sichi Bio Technology, Rep by its Proprietor, Ch. Bhavani Prasad, S/o Venkateswararao, Hindu, aged 38 years, Rl/o Plot No.5-55/1, Dulapally Road, lDA, Jeedimetla, ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Commissioner & Director of Agriculture, Andhra Pradeshl Gunfoundry, Hyderabad.

2. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary [Agriculture] Secretariat, Hyderbad.

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia playing that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of \Mrit of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the manufacturing and sale of the petitioner Bio-products as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondent not to interfere with in any manner in the manufacture, sale and distribution of the petitioners Bio-products l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(W PMP.

NO: 8584OF 20121 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent herein to allow the petitioner to manufacture, sale and distribute the Bio-products including from the licensed premises of the dealers/ stockists under the lnsecticides Act, 1968 and the Fertilizers Control (Order) Act Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. L. NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent: M/s. P.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.6756 OF 2Ol2 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.P.Sreedevi, learned Assistant Government pleader for Agriculture and Cooperation appearing for the respondents submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. 2.

Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANTFEGISTRAR u,'

SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, .TwoCCstoGPFORAGRICULTURE,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana at Hvderabad [OUTI 6#'dEi,;sRit] L'- r'rnceswAR RAo, Advocate [oPUC] . Two CD CoPies BM GJ {N2r

I HIGH COURT DATED:2310112024 .\ ( e 1 I FEB iu2i;

l()

ORDER

{ * c hT P sWP.No.6756 of 2012 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS (