B. Satya Rao v. The State Of Telangana.,Rep.,Spl Pp For CBI

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12919 OF 2015 Between:

B. Satya Rao, S/o Late B.V. Narasanna, Flat No.A-4, 4th Floor, Emerald Arcade, Prasanth Nagar, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad -1 3.

...Petitioner/Accused No. 1

AND The State of Telangana.,rep by its Special Public Prosecutor for CBl, High Court at Hyderabad

...Respondent

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C.No. 212012 on the file of the lll Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad against the petitioner (Al). l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRLPMP. NO: 12858 OF 2015 ) Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner (Al ) in C.C No. 212012 on the lll Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad pending disposal of the Criminal Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.V. VENKATA RAVI SANKAR, (Not Present) Advocate for the Petitioner and of M/s. Ananthi, Learned Special Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No.12919 OF 2015 ORDER:

The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 in C.C.No.2 of 2Ol2 on the file of the learned III Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad (for short, "the trial Court"). 2.

No representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Ms. Ananthi, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-C BI.

3.

Learned Special Public Prosecutor would submit that cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive as the C. C. No. O2 of 20 12 has already been disposed of by the trial Court vide judgment dated 07.ll.2016 and no further orders are required in this Criminal Petition. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition as infructuous 4.

Recording the submissions made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall sta,d closed. Sd/. MOHD.SANAULLAH ANS ASSISTANT REGI RI R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The lll Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad

2. Two CCs to Public prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad[OUTj.

3. One CC to Sri. P.V. Venkata Ravi Sankar, Advocate tOpUCl

4. Two CD Copies PSR gh a\

HIGH COURT DATED:1511112023

ORDER

CRLP.No.12919 o12015 lltE s14 rq R o ('

r oo APB 1 0 '/- o OZ a o €s T C f, DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS.

@,