← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/16907/2018disposed of no costs

M.Y.Narasimha v. The High Court Of Judicature At Hyderabad

2018-05-02V Ramasubramanian,J. Uma Devi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI WRIT PETITION No.16907 OF 2018 Date:02.05.2018 Between:

M.Y.Narasimha S/ o.Late Venkata Subba Rao, Visakhapatnam.

... Petitioner Vs.

The High Court ofJudicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and the Sate of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Registrar (Administration) and others.

.. Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.D.Linga Rao For Respondent :

Gist :

Head Note :

Cases Referred :

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI WRIT PETITION No.16907 OF 2018 ORDER: (per V. Ramasubramanian, J) The petitioner, who is now working as a Superintendent in the District Court, has come up with the above writ petition challenging a notice to show cause as to why the promotion earlier granted to him should not be cancelled.

2. Heard Mr.D.Linga Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. What is challenged is only a show cause notice. Therefore, all the points raised by the petitioner in the writ petition should first be canvassed before the Authority which issued the show cause notice so that the attention of the authority is drawn to the various legal aspects. The show cause notice proceeds only on the basis of a circular issued by the High Court. It is only when the petitioner presents his view points, the authority which issued the show cause notice can take an appropriate view. Therefore, we do not wish to entertain the writ petition at this stage.

4. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of granting time to the petitioner to reply to the show cause notice on or before 31.05.2018. Thereafter, the District Judge shall independently consider all aspects, without being clouded in its thinking by the stand taken in the show cause notice and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

5. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs. _____________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J ____________ J. UMA DEVI, J May 02, 2018 Note:

Furnish CC in three (3) days.

B/o.KTL